|
The Israel Koschitzky Virtual Beit Midrash
CHASSIDUT
by Rav Itamar Eldar
Yeshivat Har Etzion
ParAshat Vayigash:
"And He saw the wagons"
Rav Itamar Eldar
When Ya'akov's sons come and tell
him that Yosef is alive and well in Egypt, Ya'akov finds it difficult
to believe. In the end, however, he is convinced. The biblical verses describe
this dramatic moment as follows:
And they went up out of Egypt, and came to the land
of Cana'an to Ya'akov their father,
and told him, saying, Yosef is still
alive, and he is governor over all the land of Egypt.
And his heart fainted, for he believed them not. And they told him all the
words of Yosef, which he had said to them; and when he saw the wagons which
Yosef had sent to carry him, the spirit of Ya'akov their father revived. And Israel said: It
is enough; Yosef my son is still alive: I will go and see him before I die. (Bereishit
45:25-28)
Ya'akov
sees the wagons that Yosef had sent him, and immediately passes from a state of
"and his heart fainted," to a state of "and the spirit of
Ya'akov revived."
The midrashim
of Chazal and the Chasidic masters in their wake have tried to
understand the meaning of these wagons that altered Ya'akov's psychological
state. The midrash states:
Rabbi Levi said in the name of
Rabbi Yochanan bar Sha'ul: He said to them: "If he believes you, fine; if
not, say to him: 'When I took my departure from you, was I not studying the
section dealing with egla arufa [the heifer whose neck is
broken].'" This is the meaning of the verse: "And when he saw the
wagons… the spirit [of Ya'akov their father] revived. And Israel said: It
is enough [alternatively, 'great']." My son Yosef's strength is great, for
various troubles have befallen him, and he has remained firm in his
righteousness, much more than I have, for I have sinned saying: "My way is
hid from the Lord" (Yeshaya 40:27), and I am confident that I have
[a share in that] about which it is said: 'O how great is Your goodness' (Tehilim
31:20)." (Bereishit Rabba 94:3)
The wagons
(agalot), R. Levi tells us in the name of R. Yochanan, symbolize and
allude to the Torah section concerning the egla arufa that Yosef had
been studying before leaving for his brothers, not to return. This information,
which was known only to Ya'akov and Yosef, would prove to Ya'akov that indeed
it was Yosef who spoke to the brothers in Egypt.
The Torah
section concerning the egla arufa, which was given to Israel
centuries later at Sinai, symbolizes the important message regarding Yosef and
his father that Chazal wished to emphasize. The heifer brought by the
elders of the city that is closest to a corpse found along the road, and over
which those elders would proclaim, "Our hands have not spilled this
blood," was intended to clear Ya'akov, who had openly favored Yosef over
his brothers and had sent Yosef to them, as if to say, "My hands have not
spilled this blood."[1]
R. Levi in
the name of R. Yochanan concludes with the following words put into the mouth
of Ya'akov: "My son Yosef's strength is great, for various troubles have
befallen him, and he has remained in his righteousness, much more than I have,
for I have sinned." Ya'akov draws a comparison between himself and his son
Yosef. According to Ya'akov, he himself failed the test posed by the many
troubles that had befallen him, as he says: "My way is hid from the
Lord." In contrast, Yosef's trust in God and in the good that awaited him
never faltered.
These two mental states find
expression in the verses cited by the midrash. Let us try to understand
the context.
Yeshaya's prophecy of consolation
that opens with the words, "Comfort My people, comfort them, says your
God," (Yeshaya 40:1) continues:
Why say you, O Ya'akov, and speak,
O Yisra'el, My way is hid from the Lord, and my judgment is passed over from my
God? Have you not known? have you not heard, that the everlasting God, the
Lord, the Creator of the ends of the earth, faints not, nor is He weary? there
is no searching of his understanding. He gives power to the faint; and to the
powerless He increases strength. Even the youths shall faint and be weary, and
the young men shall utterly fall; but they that wait upon the Lord shall renew
their strength; they shall mount up with wings as eagles; they shall run, and
not be weary; they shall walk, and not faint. (Yeshaya 40:27-31)
With these
words and with the words that follow, the prophet Yeshaya tries to convince the
house of Ya'akov and Yisra'el to believe that God will eventually redeem them,
despite the exile and the difficult situation in which they now find
themselves.
The prophet
is fighting the despair that finds expression in the words, "My way is hid
from the Lord." Later in his prophecy the prophet once again states:
"Fear not, you worm Ya'akov, O men of Yisra'el, I will help you, says the
Lord, and your redeemer, the holy one of Yisra'el" (Yeshaya 41:14).
This is the
feeling that accompanies Ya'akov, as he himself attests, according to the midrash:
"For I have sinned when I said: 'My way is hid from the Lord.'"
According
to our midrash, Ya'akov learns from Yosef that a different feeling may
accompany a person in times of trouble. This feeling finds expression in the
words: "And I am confident that I have [a share in that] about which it is
said: 'O how great is Your goodness.'"
Once again a careful examination of the context of the verse may sharpen
the feeling finding expression in these words.
Let me not be ashamed, O Lord; for
I have called upon You: let the wicked be ashamed, and let them be silent in
She'ol. Let the lying lips be put to silence; which speak arrogant words,
proudly and contemptuously, against the righteous. O how great is Your
goodness, which You have laid up for those who fear You; which You have
performed for those who trust in You in the sight of the sons of men! You hide
them in the covert of Your presence from the plots of men; You shall keep them
secretly in a pavilion from the strife of tongues. Blessed be the Lord: for He
has shown me His marvelous love in a strong city. For I said in My haste, I am
cut off from before Your eyes; nevertheless You did hear the voice of my
supplications when I cried to You, O love the Lord, all his pious ones; for the
Lord preserves the faithful, and painfully repays him who acts haughtily. Be of
good courage, and let your heart be strong, all you who hope in the Lord. (Tehilim
31:18-25)
The
underlying assumption that serves as the foundation of the mental state
expressed in this psalm is: "O how great is Your goodness, which You have
laid up for those who fear You." Sometimes this goodness is "laid
up," but eventually it will break forth and appear.
In a moment
of loss of concentration, "in his haste," the psalmist lets out,
"I am cut off from before Your eyes," expressing a feeling similar to
that which underlies the words: "My way is hid from the Lord." Here,
however, we are dealing with a strange feeling that does not typify the pure
trust that accompanies the tzaddik, that even when he is surrounded by
enemies, he is in a state of "Let me not be ashamed, O Lord, for I have
called upon You."
Ya'akov
learns about this position of trust from Yosef who lived in exile, without ever
losing his hope and trust that God remains with Him wherever he goes.
This is the
transition from "My way is hidden from the Lord" to "O how great
is Your goodness," which Ya'akov undergoes, according to this midrash,
as he compares himself to his son, Yosef the tzadik.
The
prophecy in Yeshaya reads: "But they that wait upon the Lord shall
renew their strength; they shall mount up with wings as eagles; they shall run,
and not be weary; they shall walk, and not faint."
And the
psalm in Tehilim reads: "Be of good courage, and let your heart be
strong, all you who hope in the Lord."
Let not
troubles cause you to despair and become weak. Hope and trust in God will
provide you with the strength to continue.
Circles as opposed
to straight light
R.
Levi Yitzchak of Berditchov tries to connect the two parts of the midrash.
The wagons that convince Ya'akov to believe and to go down to see his son
Yosef, on the one hand, and the mental state that Ya'akov acquires in the wake
of Yosef's firm stand, on the other.
"And when he saw the wagons
which Yosef had sent." He alludes [here] to Ya'akov that he should not
worry about the exile, for it is all the cause of redemption, evil being the
cause of good. Now, agalot ("wagons") has the sense of igul,
"circle." A cause is referred to as being something round, whereas
simple mercy is straight light, while causes are circles. (Kedushat Levi,
Vayigash)
According
to R. Levi Yitzchak, Ya'akov is worried about going down to Egypt, because
of his perspective and his outlook. Yosef, in sending the wagons, wishes to
provide Ya'akov with a different perspective on the world, one that will allow
him to go down to Egypt
and accept the exile that the journey imposes.
R. Levi Yitzchak's draws a
profound distinction between a circle and straight light, which is also an
expression of rachamim peshutim, "simple mercy."
This distinction is based upon
the difference between a circle and a straight line. Let us try to understand
this difference.
It may be suggested that a
straight line symbolizes continuous progress and advancement. Walking in a
straight line indicates clear direction and a clear destination. Each point
along that line brings a person closer and closer to that destination. When
walking along a straight line, there is no retreat and no return.
A circle, in contrast, symbolizes
finiteness and periodicity. Over and over again, we return to our starting
point, and every step forward is also a step backward.
The causality in life is part of
its finiteness. The wagons/circles that Yosef sends Ya'akov symbolize the
recognition that over the course of life there may be retreat which is itself
the cause of further advance.
From this perspective, Ya'akov
expresses the totality that seeks a perfect world in which progress is evident
in each and every step. He is not ready to accept the circularity of life that
gives expression to its finiteness.
When a person dies, it is
customary to express grief by eating round foods: whole eggs, lentils, and the
like. Roundness gives expression to the cycle of life that has once again come
to an end; this is what Ya'akov has difficulty coming to terms with. Ya'akov is
an ish tam, tam in the sense of perfect, and perfection must be
manifest at every stage and at every moment.
Yosef, on the other hand,
understands that "the taste of the tree is not like the taste of the
fruit," and that the world is constructed of means and goals, and that
sometimes the means appear to lack taste, and may even be bitter, and at times
even poisonous. This means, however, will give rise to a fruit for the sake of
which the means exists. This is the circularity that allows for survival even
in the period of exile.
According to this interpretation,
Ya'akov's position is idealistic, whereas that of Yosef is in great measure
realistic. The circles symbolizing the causality of the world are what enable
Yosef to endure so many years of exile all alone in a foreign country
with no help or support. These years may, perhaps, have provided him with this
outlook.
On a deeper level, however, the
matter may be understood differently, and to a great degree in a manner that is
just the very opposite of what we have explained thus far. We shall try to
examine the issue by way of another expression connected to R. Levi Yitzchak's
"straight light," namely "simple mercy." Thus writes R.
Menachem Mendel of Vitebsk:
These things are apprehension of
the Divine before the creation of the worlds, where there is no choice,
standing or endurance for even a short time, but only as the flash of
lightening. This is the meaning of "He saw that the world could not exist,
etc." Now the tzadikim like them raise with this thought all the gevurot
and sweetening of the judgments at their source above the order of the
creation of the world and of time, which is the attribute of "simple
mercy," which is "abundant in lovingkindness" before the
creation. For these attributes are not evident in the tzadikim. They
accept upon themselves din, rachamim and all the afin as
equal in order to apprehend the truth of the light and view Him through that
curtain. Thus said the Rabbis of blessed memory (Bereishit Rabba 1, 5):
"Israel
rose first in thought." And this is: "Return Israel to the Lord, your
God," which means to return to the beginning of the thought that was
before the creation of the world, when all the afin were equal, and the
attributes of din and rachamim are cancelled at their source. (Peri
ha-Aretz, derush le-Shabbat Teshuva)
R. Menachem
Mendel of Vitebsk
describes two different states:
One,
"before the creation of the worlds," a state in which there is no
choice, standing or endurance for even a short time. This is a state that
stands above time, the aspect of a flash of lightening, or the blink of an eye,
lacking all substance.
The second
state is after the creation of the worlds, belonging to "the order of the
creation of the world and time."
The first
is called rav chesed, "abundant in lovingkindness," whereas
the second is called rachamim peshutim, "simple mercy."
R. Menachem
Mendel describes the psychological state of one who successfully raises himself
to the level of apprehension of "before the creation of the worlds,"
that is, the apprehension of the great tzadikim.
When
a person merits to reach such a level, din (judgment), rachamim (mercy),
and all the afim (all the faces, all the sides of reality – are the
same. The trait of equanimity is connected to the fact that this world is void
of substance and concreteness, and so at the root of all things, in their initial
potential, in the spiritual source from which they derive their nurture,
everything is good and everything is from Him.
R. Menachem
Mendel calls this situation "elevation of all the gevurot and
sweetening of the judgment," for what appears to us as evil and judgment
is in its true source only lovingkindness.[2] This is similar to a child whose
superficial perspective on the world is polar. A caress from his father is
good, but a slap from him is bad. As the child matures and acquires a deeper
understanding of the root of things, he understands how both the slap and the
caress come from the same place – the desire to bestow love and benevolence.
This is the aspect of "abundant in lovingkindness" that R. Menachem
Mendel is talking about, where all is one, and the perfect and absolute goal is
to benefit, and all multiplicity is an illusion resulting from the different
facets of the same coin. As opposed to "abundant in lovingkindness"
stands "simple mercy," which is taken from a world of defined
categories where evil is evil and good is good.[3] Mercy is an expression of
the integration of judgment and lovingkindness, and it includes the duality and
multiplicity of the concrete world.
Straight sefirot
and Round Sefirot
R. Menachem Mendel's
distinction is connected to two of the ideas mentioned by R. Levi Yitzchak of
Berditchov: "straight light" and circles. These two ideas are
integrated in the following words of R. Chayyim Luzzato:
After having explained in general
terms the appearance of the merkava (Divine chariot), we shall begin to
explain the main details that must be distinguished. First of all, there is the
general form of the sefirot, namely, circles and straight lines… A
circle represents causal [sovevet] governance that is not divided
into chesed, din, and rachamim… This is the secret of the
figure of a circle, which lacks division into parts, for one cannot talk about
a beginning, or an end, or a middle, or right or left… A straight line, on the
other hand, represents governance divided according to cheder [chesed,
din, rachamim] – right, left, and middle… Then we distinguish
measures to know this extension, and the value between them, and the
consequences, and all the other things that are distinguished in faces. (Kalach
Pitchei Chokhma, petach 13)
R. Moshe
Chayyim Luzzatto distinguishes here between two manners in which God conducts
the world, by way of circles and by way of straight lines.[4]
In
governance by way of circles, which is also called causal [sovevet] governance,[5]
there are no distinctions.
This lack
of distinctions is significant on two plains – on the plain of giving and on
the plain of receiving.
First, in
this mode of governing the world, no distinction is made between any one of
God's creatures and another, between one who is righteous and one who is evil.
God's profusion is bestowed upon all of His creatures, irrespective of their
actions.[6]
Second, in
this mode of governing the world, no distinction is made between lovingkindness
and judgment, and so all the distinctions between reward and punishment,
between good and evil, and all the other distinctions resulting from
multiplicity and extension, also do not exist.
This is the
world that R. Menachem Mendel calls "before the creation of the
worlds," in which there is no free choice, for the Divine profusion does
not correspond to actions, but rather is deterministic and absolute, there
being no distinction between judgment and lovingkindness.
In
contrast, the mode of straightness, is the world of distinctions, where there
is a distinction between judgment and lovingkindness, between reward and
punishment, and thus there is also a distinction in the profusion upon each
individual, according to the measure appropriate for him, whether for reward or
for punishment.
The circle,
asserts the Ramchal, has no beginning, middle or end; in this sense it is
infinite, void of distinction. For this reason it gives expression to the
infinite mode of governing the world that preceded the world of boundaries and
definitions.
To the
degree that the tzadik elevates himself to this quality and this mode of
governance, so is he denied free choice. His cleaving to the infinite provides
him with the quality of equanimity in which all judgments are sweetened and
rise to their source.
In light of
this approach, let us now reexamine the words of R. Levi Yitzchak of
Berditchov.
Circles are connected to causes (siba),
and not just in the sense of sivuv, "rotation, circle."
Relating to a particular thing as
the cause of something else significantly alters one's perspective.
That thing is no longer judged
and measured according to its objective and independent reality, but according
to its function. Judging something according to its function changes the way we
perceive it. Let us examine this idea with the help of an amazing parable found
in the Zohar:
Outside the palace, however, there
lived a beautiful harlot. After a while the king thought: "I will see how
far my son is devoted to me." So he sent to the woman and commanded her,
saying: "Entice my son, for I wish to test his obedience to my will."
So she used every blandishment to lure him into her embraces. But the son,
being good, obeyed the commandment of his father. He refused her allurements
and thrust her from him. Then did the father rejoice exceedingly, and, bring
him in to the innermost chamber of the palace, bestow upon him gifts from his
best treasures, and show him every honor. And who was the cause of all this joy?
The harlot! Is she to be praised or blamed for it? To be praised, surely, on
all accounts, for on the one hand she fulfilled the king's command and carried
out his plans for him, and on the other hand she caused the son to receive all
the good gifts and deepened the king's love to his son. Therefore, it is
written: "And the Lord saw all that He had made, and behold it was very
good." "It was good" – this is the angel of life; "very
good" – this is the angel of death, for it is certainly very good, obeying
its master's commands. (Zohar, II, p. 163a)
The Zohar tells of a king
who had a beautiful harlot living outside his palace. The king commanded the
harlot to try and seduce his son in order to see how devoted his son is to him,
and the extent to which he obeys him and does not allow himself to be led
astray by his passions.
The Zohar continues in its
description of how the son withstands the test, how he is not seduced, and how
he sends the harlot away. Thus, the son merits all of his father's honor and
veneration for having withstood the test and demonstrated his love for his
father by obeying him.
Who is the cause of all this,
asks the Zohar? And it daringly answers: The harlot.
The Zohar asks again so
that there be no mistake: Should we praise the harlot for what she did, or
condemn her? And it answers that we must certainly praise her from every
possible angle. First, asserts the Zohar, she obeyed the king's command.
And second, she was the cause of all the love and good feelings between the
king and the son that arose in the aftermath of the test. The Zohar concludes
with its exposition of the verse, "And it was very good":
"Good" – the angel of life; "very" – the angel of death who
obeys its Master's command.
The Zohar's astonishing
approach to the question of evil in the world is the aspect of circles.
The Zohar does not
contemplate the actions of the prostitute or the actions of the angel of death
in and of themselves, but rather their function – what they cause.
When a person merits seeing
things from the perspective of "circles," he examines everything
according to its function and the objective towards which it is headed.
This is sweetening the judgment
at its source, for the source of the evil is the will of the king, just as all
of the evil actions of the prostitute are nothing but a fulfillment of the
royal command, which is their source.
This perspective turns evil into
the cause of good, distress into the cause of redemption. It is precisely the
structure of the circle that illustrates this profound idea.
A straight line sets a clear
standard; going in one direction constitutes retreat, whereas proceeding in the
opposite direction constitutes progress. Everything is dichotomous: there is
progress and there is retreat; there is ascent and there is descent; there is mitzva
and there is sin.
The circle, on the other hand,
causes total confusion. As one distances oneself from any particular point on
the circle, one gets closer to it from the other side. Every movement on the
circle involves both advance and retreat. Advance is retreat and retreat is
advance.
Yosef the tzadik reflects
upon the Egyptian exile through the eyes of his spirit; he does not view the
situation in isolation. He is able to skip over the crushing servitude, the
decree regarding the firstborns, the awful distance from the land of Israel,
and the cries directed at heaven. All that he sees is how these years are
fashioning the Jewish people and preparing them to receive the Torah and enter
the land of Israel.
He reflects not upon the terrible
events that will take place in the exile, but upon the role of exile. He
reflects upon the world through the spectacles of "cause"; through
this prism, everything rotates around one central point – the Divine will
working to repair the world. This is the perspective of the aspect of circles.
As opposed to going around in a
circle, walking along a straight line involves one of two contradictory mental
movements.
On a straight line, the direction
is maintained and the orientation is constant. We always know where we have
come from, and where we are headed. We can always examine our location and the
direction of our movement. Are we going forward or backward? Have we already
journeyed far or only a short distance? The answers to these questions are very
simple when one is walking along a straight line.
On a circle, with each passing
moment, one loses more and more of one's sense of direction. Where are we? Have
we already arrived? Are we going forward or backward? Are we getting closer or
further away?
The ability to judge reality
gradually disappears. The world begins to assume the appearance of great chaos.
Things that a person thought would serve him well end up casting him into a
pit, while abysmal failures quickly reveal themselves as great salvation. What
is good and what is evil? What must one hope for and what must one run away
from? Are we dealing with reward or punishment? A person loses control and his
ability to choose, confusion rules, and at the height of the confusion, a
moment before the collapse, he has a new insight, whose time arrives only after
the redeeming confusion succeeds in freeing the person from the chains of the
"simple mercy" of the mode of straight governance, according to which
everything is catalogued and confined in definitions and drawers.
The new understanding does not
draw distinctions or offer definitions. Everything is the reason for something
and the result of something, and one process having an inner central point
unites all of reality to some primal point around which there are many circles.
Yosef the tzadik lived
through many years of confusion that prepared him to apprehend the circles.
From the
pit in which Yosef anticipated his end, he saw the redeeming convoy that a
moment later shackled him in the chains of Egyptian bondage. His success in the
house of Potifar suddenly turned into a tragedy that cast him into prison. And
it was from this catastrophic situation, from which for a moment Yosef thought
he would never recover, that Yosef eventually merited the status of viceroy.
All the good things that happened
to Yosef turned out to be bad, and all the bad things turned out to be good.
This difficult life experience cast Yosef into great confusion. Eventually, he
recognized that events must be judged not according to their objective nature,
but according to their place on the circle – their causes and effects.
This new recognition reaches its
climax in the following words of Yosef to his brothers: "But as for you,
you thought evil against me; but God meant it for good, to bring it to pass at
this day that much people should be saved alive" (Bereishit 50:20).
From the perspective of
"straight light," the sale of Yosef is measured in and of itself, and
its severity is truly immeasurable.
From the perspective of circles,
however, Yosef reflects upon the Divine will that stands behind the events.
What is the cause, in which direction is the wheel spinning, and where are the
events leading? From what are we distancing ourselves as we proceed along the
circle, and what are we coming closer to? – "To bring it to pass at this
day that much people should be saved alive."
At this moment, Yosef sweetens
the gevurot and the judgments. Yosef acquires the trait of equanimity
that allows him to look upon those who wish him evil - in the very manner that
the king's son looked upon the prostitute - and bless them.
According to this interpretation,
the circles depicted by the eggs and lentils eaten when a person encounters
death and mourning do not mark the end of life, but rather its cause.
Indeed, death involves moving
away from life, but at the same time it also involves drawing near to life of
another sort. This is the circle in which every move away is also a move
towards, and every severance is also a joining.
These are the wagons that Yosef
sent his father Ya'akov. For only one who lives with the consciousness of
circles is able to stand up in times of trouble, and rather than cry out,
"My way is hid from the Lord," proclaim "O how great is Your
goodness, which You have laid up for those who fear You."
The prophet Yeshaya who
criticizes these words of the house of Ya'akov opens his prophecy with the
words, "Comfort My people, comfort them, says your God." Thus, he
attempts to teach Israel
the perspective of the circles, through which we recognize the constructive
role of all events, even the most difficult among them.
Exile is the cause of redemption,
says Yosef to Ya'akov, and from the moment that we see things in this manner,
exile becomes sweet, for it too is part of the perfect and infinite whole.
So too thought R. Akiva who,
together with the other Sages, saw a fox emerging from the Holy of Holies:
Again it happened that [Rabban
Gamliel, Rabbi Elazar ben Azarya, Rabbi Yehoshua and Rabbi Akiva] went up to
Jerusalem. When they reached Mount
Scopus, they tore their
garments. When they reached the Temple
Mount, they saw a fox
emerging from the place of the Holy of Holies. The others started weeping;
Rabbi Akiva laughed. They said to him: "Why are you laughing?" He
answered: "Why are you weeping?" They said to him: "A place [so
holy] that it is said of it, 'The stranger that approaches it shall die,' and
now foxes traverse it, and we shouldn't weep?" He said to them: "That
is why I laugh. For it is written: 'I shall have bear witness for Me faithful
witnesses - Uriya the Priest and Zekharya the son of Yevarekhya.' Now what is
the connection between Uriya and Zekharya? Uriya was [in the time of] the first
Temple, and Zekharya was [in the time of] the
second Temple!
But Scripture makes Zekharya's prophesy dependent upon Uriya's prophesy. With
Uriya, it is written: 'Therefore, because of you, Zion
shall be plowed as a field; [Jerusalem shall
become heaps, and the Temple
Mount like the high
places of a forest].' With Zekharya it is written: 'Old men and women shall yet
sit in the streets of Jerusalem.'
As long as Uriya's prophesy had not been fulfilled, I feared that Zekharya's
prophesy may not be fulfilled either. But now that Uriya's prophesy has been
fulfilled, it is certain that Zekharya's prophesy will be fulfilled." With
these words they replied to him: "Akiva, you have consoled us! Akiva, you
have consoled us!" (Makkot 24b)
R. Akiva sees the prophecy of
Uriya, the harshest of prophecies, as the cause of the shining and lofty
prophecy of Zekharya. From the moment that Uriya's prophecy turned into a
cause, even the fox emerging from the Holy of Holies turned into sweetness that
causes R. Akiva to laugh.
"Comfort My people, comfort
them." The prophet Yeshaya asks the house of Ya'akov to deepen its
perspective on the world and raise it to the level of circles. And R. Akiva's
colleagues, thanks to R. Akiva's profound thinking and his elevation, in the
manner of Yosef, to the unified reality of Divine governance of the world,
respond to Yeshaya's request: "Akiva, you have consoled us! Akiva, you
have consoled us!"
FOOTNOTES:
[1] Some draw the connection in a more spiritual and
abstract manner: "'The wagons… the spirit of Ya'akov their father
revived.' And Chazal say: He gave them a sign; when he left him, he had
been studying the Torah section regarding the egla arufa. This is what
is meant by what is said: 'And he saw the wagons.'" That is to say, Yosef
sent to Ya'akov: Why are you upset, why is your face fallen imagining that
Yosef had then been torn to pieces. Surely when I left you, we were studying
the Torah section regarding the egla arufa. And you performed all
aspects of accompaniment with protection to join me to the Shekhina, as
it were, and to the accompanying angels. How then could mischief have befallen
me? And therefore, "And when he saw the wagons… the spirit of Ya'akov
their father revived." When he saw that [God's] commandments were
performed appropriately and that they yield fruit, that He won't be ashamed
before Him in the world-to-come" (Be'er Mayim Chayyim, Vayeshev,
37). [R. Chayyim of Czernowitz (1760-1818), one of the most important disciples
of Rabbi Yechiel Michel of Zolochev.]
[2] We spoke at length about the quality of equanimity in
our lecture on parashat Chayyei Sara.
[3] Thus, this is the very opposite of the first
interpretation.
[4] We have cited selected sections of his teachings. Even
these we shall not analyze in a deep and thorough manner. We shall make use of
them only for the purpose of defining the concepts of straightness and circles.
[5] It should be remembered that R. Levi Yitzchak also draws
a connection between "cause" and "circle."
[6] This point is not spelled out in the aforementioned
passage, but it does appear in many other places.
[Translated by David Strauss]
|