|
The Israel Koschitzky Virtual Beit
Midrash
Halakha: A Weekly Shiur In Halakhic Topics Yeshivat Har
Etzion
*********************************************************
This shiur is in honor of the birth of our bechor. May he be
zoche l'Torah, l'chupa ul'maasim tovim. Aaron and Malka Simkovich.
Mazal tov to his grandparents, Moshe and Laurie Simkovich and
Allen and Naomi Zeiger, and great-grandparents, Beatrice Simkovich, Dan and Joan
Kunitz, Ann Zeiger and Aaron and Ferol Sabghir.
*********************************************************
Personal Requests in Shomeia Tefilla
By Rav Shlomo Levi
WHERE REQUESTS ARE TO BE MADE
The gemara in Avoda Zara (7b) quotes a number of tanaim's
opinions about where personal requests are to be made in the silent prayer, the
Shemoneh Esrei.
1. Nachum Hamadi and the sages say: "One should make requests
during 'Shomeia Tefilla' ('He Hears Prayer' - the 16th blessing of the Shemoneh
Esrei)."
2. Rabbi Eliezer says: "One should make his requests and then
pray."
3. Rabbi Yehoshua says: "One should pray and then make
requests."
The gemara explains that the argument between Rabbi Eliezer and
Rabbi Yehoshua revolves around whether to accept Rabbi Simlai's directive, "One
should always first praise God and then make requests." Rabbi Yehoshua agrees.
But Rabbi Eliezer rejects this approach which derives from the prayers of Moshe;
only the spiritually powerful Moshe Rabbeinu is able to pray that way. For
others this would be considered presumptuous (Rashi).
The gemara then quotes a number of other opinions.
A. Rav Yehuda son of Rav Shmuel son of Rav Shilat quoting Rav
-- "Even though they say that personal requests are to be made in 'Shomeia
Tefilla,' they can be added on to the end of each of the other blessings as long
as it is in line with the blessing's topic."
B. Rav Chiya son of Ashi quoting Rav -- "Even though they say
that personal requests are to be made in 'Shomeia Tefilla,' if there is a sick
person in one's house he can be mentioned in the blessing on the sick
(Refaeinu), and if one needs sustenance it can be mentioned in the blessing
about the year (Bareikh Aleinu)."
C. Rav Yehoshua son of Levi says, "Even though they say that
personal requests are to be made in 'Shomeia Tefilla,' if one wants to, after
the Shemoneh Esrei he can even pray as much as the Yom Kippur prayer."
ADDING PERSONAL REQUESTS TO SHEMONEH ESREI
The desire to include personal requests within the Shemoneh
Esrei, not as an independent prayer, seems to be two-fold: it enhances the
requests and enhances the Shemoneh Esrei.
It enhances the requests: A personal request is much more
powerful in the context of Shemoneh Esrei. During Shemoneh Esrei, standing
before the Divine King in His inner sanctum, is the most opportune time to make
a request. Furthermore, the Shemoneh Esrei is formulated in the plural, so his
personal requests are bound up with that of the whole people of Israel.
It enhances the Shemoneh Esrei: They add an element of
freshness and individuality to the standard prayer and strengthen the
individual's connection with his prayers.
On the other hand, there are a number of possible difficulties
with including personal requests in the Shemoneh Esrei. First, any additions
involve a deviation from the standard text instituted by the Anshei Knesset
Hagedola (Men of the Great Assembly). Second, personal requests increase the
danger that prayer becomes more self-centered, a way of attaining things and
taking care of personal problems. This raises questions about how much our
"trivial" issues can be introduced into prayer. True, God provides for all of
our needs, as petty as they may seem to us. But how much should they be part of
the text of prayer? How does inserting personal requests into prayer fit with
Rabbi Meir's statement on Berakhot 61a?
"Rav Huna quoted Rav who, in turn, quoted Rabbi Meir: One's
words should always be few before The Holy One, blessed be He, as it says, 'Do
not be hasty with your mouth and your heart should not rush to put out words
before God, for God is in Heaven and you are on the earth.' Therefore your words
should be few. "
THE STATUS OF SHOMEIA TEFILLA
We will now attempt, to investigate the status of personal
requests added to Shomeia Tefilla and how advisable it is to use this track of
prayer.
The gemara, as quoted above, explains the argument between
Rabbi Eliezer (personal requests precede Shemoneh Esrei) and Rabbi Yehoshua
(Shemoneh Esrei precedes) without explaining how they argue with Nachum Hamadi
and the sages (who say to add requests to Shomeia Tefilla). If we assume that
both Rabbi Eliezer and Rabbi Yehoshua agree about the importance of inserting
personal requests, we are forced to explain that they must be concerned about
tampering with the text of the Shemoneh Esrei. It is, therefore, impossible to
make additions in the midst of Shemoneh Esrei. The dispute can be explained,
then, in one of two ways:
A. The sages were less concerned about preserving the text, and
therefore permit making additions to Shomeia Tefilla;
B. According to the sages, adding to Shomeia Tefilla is not
considered tampering with the text of Shemoneh Esrei because the blessing of
Shomeia Tefilla was originally intended to be the framework for personal
requests.
Whereas the first approach (A.) views personal requests in
Shomeia Tefilla as an extraneous addition to Shemoneh Esrei (that is, however,
not considered a prohibited break, a "hefseik"), the second (B.) views them as
an integral part of the text of Shomeia Tefilla.
What also emerges are two possible understandings of the nature
of the Shomeia Tefilla blessing. In general, understanding the place of Shomeia
Tefilla is a bit difficult. The blessing seems somewhat superfluous, apparently
just a prayer that the other prayers will be accepted. There are a number of
possible resolutions.
As the Responsa Hillel Omeir (#46) writes, it might simply be a
prayer that God should listen to our prayers despite our lack of proper
concentration.
Alternatively, it might relate to a whole different sphere of
prayer. The gemara in Megilla (18a) explains how the later blessings relate to
different stages of the redemption. "I will bring them to My holy mountain" -
Matzmiach Keren Yeshua; "I will make them joyous in my house of prayer" -
Shomeia Tefilla; and "Their burnt offerings and sacrifices . . ." - Avoda
("R''tzei . . .). The blessing of Shomeia Tefilla might relate to the level of
prayer that will come with the messianic restoration of the Temple. There is
certainly no problem of superfluity, but there would seem to be no room for
making personal requests either.
A third approach (related to explanation B. above) is taken by
Rabbeinu Yona. With regards to additions to other blessings, he emphasizes that
restrictions on additions are aimed at preserving the text and making sure there
are no extraneous breaks in the Shemoneh Esrei. In Shomeia Tefilla, though, "one
can make all requests on any issue because Shomeia Tefilla includes all requests
and for this purpose it was instituted." The text of the gemara lends support to
his approach. Additions to other blessings are prefaced by, "Even though . . ."
(still, additions can be made); additions to Shomeia Tefilla are introduced by,
"If he wants to . . ." [The gemara in Megilla quoted above might just refer to
the basis for the order of the blessings.]
Even though, as the Beit Yosef points out, the Rosh and other
rishonim do not agree with Rabbeinu Yona's restrictions on other additions, they
do not necessarily argue on his approach to the nature of Shomeia Tefilla.
What if one has no personal prayers to add to Shomeia Tefilla?
Would Rabbeinu Yona say that his blessing ends up being invalid? It is clear
that this is not the case. The blessing is two-tiered. It is a framework within
which personal requests can be introduced (whether we add them or not), but
definitely includes a general prayer for the acceptance of all of our prayers.
This is alluded to in the text of the prayer, which, at first glance, seems
repetitious. "You listen to prayers and supplication" refers to prayers in
general; and "for You listen to the prayer of all mouths," refers to personal
requests.
OBLIGATION
Perhaps, though, if one has a personal request to make, it is
obligatory to make it. The Ramban argues with the Rambam about the biblical
command to pray. According to the Rambam there is a daily obligation to pray.
The Ramban (in his glosses to the Rambam's Sefer Hamitzvot, Mitzva 5) suggests
that there might only be a biblical mitzva to turn to God through prayer in
times of crisis. "It is a mitzva in times of troubles to trust that He, may He
be blessed and exalted, listens to prayer and saves from troubles with prayer
and crying out." Perhaps Shomeia Tefilla is the rabbinic framework within which
the biblical mitzva is to be fulfilled.
The sages might have built on the biblical mitzva in two ways:
through instituting a framework within which to prayer in times of crisis; and
by expanding the concept of "troubles" ("tzarot") to include the broader
category of "needs" ("tzrakhav").
Rabbi Yaakov Emden (in his siddur) might be in line with this
approach when he says, "We hold that a person should make his requests in
Shomeia Tefilla . . . and this is the main biblical level prayer ('ikkar tefilla
mideoraita')." It seems to be based on the Ramban and refer to an obligation.
CONCLUSION
We have presented three possible understandings for making
personal requests:
1. an addition to prayer;
2. an integral part of the text of prayer for one who adds
them;
3. an obligation for the person with needs.
We now have the principles with which to deal with the
following three questions (though they are outside the scope of this
article):
A. Is it preferable to make requests in Shomeia Tefilla as
opposed to other blessings?
B. Can one who missed one of the other blessings make it up in
Shomeia Tefilla?
C. If one forgot to add the prayer for rain in its proper place
and remembers during the last three blessings, should he return to the rain
blessing or to Shomeia Tefilla?
The acharonim divide up into different camps on the issue of
how open we are to making additions to prayer. The different approaches might
also depend on whether personal requests are an integral part of prayer or
extraneous additions.
The Bach (OC 119) limits making requests only to when there is
a specific need. The Taz (OC 122:2) is also conservative and prohibits making a
permanent personal addition to the text of prayer. He seems more concerned about
the text than breaks in the prayer.
On the other hand, the Magen Avraham (OC 119) writes that it is
good to add a prayer for repentance and for livelihood, apparently without any
special need. His source is the Arizal and is quoted by later authorities
without contest. The Chayei Adam (quoted by the Mishna Berura OC 122) writes
that, "it is proper and fitting for everyone to pray every day about his
livelihood and that Torah should not depart from his mouth and his children's' .
. . as long as it comes from the heart." (See also the Sefer Chasidim #128)
POST SCRIPT
Making personal additions to prayer aids in strengthening the
element of supplication in prayer and adds to its innovative, flowing side that
the sages emphasized. It also serves to strengthen our trust in God through the
power of prayer. When one adds personal requests in prayer it is also clear that
he is not only praying in order to fulfill an obligation but because he desires
to stand before God and serve Him.
Of course we must be cautious about how we make additions and
not tampering with the standard text of the Shemoneh Esrei, along with not
letting our personal prayers become rote either. However, the sources seem to
push the positive aspects of the personal side of prayer, adding personal
requests.
"God is close to all those who call Him, to all who call Him in
truth."
(Adapted from Daf Kesher #587, Adar I 5757, vol. 6, pp.
434-438. Translated by Rav Eliezer Kwass. This adaptation was not reviewed by
the author.)
|