RAV KOOK’S LETTERS
By Rav Tamir Granot
Lecture #14a:
Letters of Rav Kook – Letter 89
We will now begin to study Letters 89-91, all of which are addressed
to R. Moshe Seidel, addressing similar issues and complementing each other.
You may read about R. Moshe Seidel in the introduction to Letter 20, which was
also addressed to him.
We begin with Letter 89. This letter deals with several topics, all
of which are related. Due to its length, I will divide it into two parts, each
of which will be the subject of a lecture.
Introduction to Letter 89 – Part A
This is one of the earliest letters that we have, from Av 5664 (the
summer of 1904), soon after Rav Kook’s aliya. (R. Zvi Yehuda explains in
a footnote that these letters were discovered only later, after the first volume
had been typeset, and so appear out of order in print.)
At that time, R. Seidel was studying in Europe, and his
correspondence with Rav Kook includes, inter alia, issues that came up in
the course of his studies. He writes to Rav Kook as a disciple to his master,
and Rav Kook’s explanations are in turn lengthy and didactic, as befits a
teacher instructing his pupil. It is clear from the letters that Rav Kook held
this student in high esteem, and he even compliments R. Seidel for his
understanding of Rav Kook’s thought.
The letters address topics that were close to R. Seidel’s heart,
whether due to his “professional” occupation (Bible) or his familiarity with
Western Europe.
Letter 89 deals mainly with ethical topics, and particularly with
the morality of the Torah vis-à-vis gentile nations and the essence of the
Torah’s moral expectations in general.
We are not in possession of R. Seidel’s letters, and so his
questions can only be partially reconstructed.
I have divided the letter into sections based on the topics raised.
The following is my division:
·
Section A: Introduction –
The Importance of Spiritual Study and Clarifying Questions
·
Section B: Morality,
Education, and History
·
Section
C: Natural Slavery
and Legal Slavery
·
Section D: The Slavery of
Canaan – Slavery as a National Trait
·
Section E: Abolition of
Slavery According to the Torah
·
Section F: The Law and
Beyond the Letter of the Law
·
Section G: The Divine
Design in History
·
Section H: The Apparent
Discrimination between the Rights of Jews and the Rights of Gentiles
·
Section I: The Torah’s Laws
of War
·
Section J: The Attitude
toward Secularists and toward Bad Opinions
·
Conclusion
The following is an approximated
reconstruction of R. Seidel’s questions to Rav Kook, in order of appearance:
1.
(Sections B-C) Slavery is
permitted according to the Torah, and there is even a mitzva aspect of it
(with regard to the Canaanites). How is it possible that the Torah permits (and
even recommends) a phenomenon that we recognize as morally reprehensible?
2.
(ibid.) Moreover, it
seems that the Torah is premised here on the moral basis of early historical
eras. Isn’t the moral condition of the Modern Era superior? If so, the law of
slavery that the Torah permitted should consequently be abolished, and thus the
Torah is time-bound!
3.
(Sections D, F) The
question of slavery is even sharper because the Torah relates slavery to the
Canaanites specifically – and to the Hamites more generally – which suggests a
racist taint and creates an impression that the Torah’s worldview is opposed to
the values of humanism and equality of all people. Moreover, is it right that
Noach’s curse should affect an entire race?
4.
(Section D) The law of “One
or two days” (Shemot 21:20-21), which absolves a master who struck and
killed his slave under certain conditions (“he shall not be avenged, since it
was his money”), seems to discriminate between the blood of a slave, which is
cheapened, and the blood of a regular person!
5.
(Section E) Should we
support abolitionist legislation drafted by American Christians and European
liberals?
6.
(Section H) Why do certain
laws discriminate between Jews and gentiles? For example, Chazal derived
regarding the mitzva or returning lost objects: “‘your brother’ – not a
gentile,” i.e., the obligation applies only to the lost object of a Jew.
7.
(ibid.) Why is it
forbidden for a gentile to study Torah? This prohibition seems to indicate a
fundamental negation of moral development, for if Torah study were a matter of
choice, what reason would there be to forbid it to them?
8.
(ibid.) The Rambam
determines that the righteous gentiles, who have a share in the World to Come,
are only those who observe the seven Noahide laws by virtue of the acceptance of
the Torah. In light of the fact that the nations did not receive the Torah, is
that fair? Isn’t this a negation of natural, voluntary human morality?
9.
(Section I) The Torah’s
laws of war seem cruel and immoral (e.g., “let nothing live”), as were the
martial norms practiced in the times of Yehoshua and David. Of course, this
question arises primarily in comparison with the laws of war currently accepted
by advanced nations.
10.
(Section J) The final
question or questions deal with the liberal position that permits the voicing of
any opinion, even negative or heretical, and values opposing ideologies equally.
How can this be reconciled with the prohibition against voicing evil or
heretical opinions, which Rav Kook supports, and how do we confront the
legitimacy of the secularist option?
The main issue in the first part of the letter, which we will study this week,
is slavery. To this letter I have also appended a short segment from
Letter 90, in which Rav Kook clarifies some of his ideas in the wake of R.
Seidel’s questions on Letter 89.
Section F, which deals with the status of
“beyond the letter of the law” (lifnim mi-shurat ha-din) is not an
integral part of the discussion of slavery and will therefore be addressed in
the second lecture.
You are welcome to read the letter and make use of the notes.
21 Av, 5664
A: Introduction – The Importance of
Spiritual Study and Clarifying Questions
To my beloved friend, delightful and pleasant, imbued with
understanding and knowledge of the awe of God, sharp-witted and learned, our
teacher, R. Moshe Seidel, may his light shine, and in all that pertains to him,
shalom.
Your precious words gladdened my heart while I sat in the pleasant
fields of the colony of Rechovot in Judea, with the view of the Judean hills
before my eyes, and I was inspired as I contemplated the glory of God that
crowned us here in days gone by and that will continue to crown us with His
benevolence in days to come, as his words do not go unfulfilled. Indeed, we must
prepare ourselves with the spirit of God for our glorious future, with the
spirit of knowledge and the light of God, which will have the power to unite all
the forces of renewal in our nation and ready us for a healthy and perfect life,
life which will be an example for all the nations of the world in their strength
and courage, and in the glory of their holiness and grandeur,
so that we then will be able to fulfill the mission befitting the nation of
Israel in the land of Israel. This is impossible except by combining all the
good found in the lives of both the fathers and the sons,
in such a manner that not only will the good in one way of life not oppose the
good of the other way, but that both sides will also strengthen and exalt one
another. This is the principle of returning the hearts of the fathers to the
children and the hearts of the children to the fathers. These are the thoughts
which occupy me, and thank God that everything I believed outside this land
about what needs to be done for the good of our nation and our land is in
keeping with what I see here in our holy land, inspired by a spirit of purity
which will invigorate all actions, so that we may say, "O house of Jacob, come,
and let us walk in the light of the Lord."
And here, I was thinking of the thirst for the word of God, taking in
our generation the form of a fainting thirst.
Only in the most fortunate and those closest to holiness has this disease of
thirst not turned longing into revulsion. I know, without a doubt, that only to
the extent that we spread the work of God and the light of the Torah in a
language known to those with parched thirst will our might increase. Thus will
we be fit to wear our splendor and the raiment of our glory, and deserving
redemption and salvation, as we return to God and his holy word in love, a love
born of recognition and understanding. "And from there you will seek the Lord
your God, and you will find him, if you seek with all your heart and all your
soul." And this request made with one's entire heart and entire soul can not be
fulfilled except after the removal of all the darkness of confusion which blocks
the light of Israel, so that it cannot be revealed in its majestic splendor.
Only when we recognize our own value, the merit of having the spirit of God upon
us, only then will our sublime might return to us and [enable] us to know how to
live in our holy land after all the many difficult trials [God] imposed on us to
teach us knowledge and wisdom.
For this reason, I see in any youth who comes, seeks, asks, and speaks of his
confusion the likeness of a precious stone, onyx or jasper, destined to be set
in the gates of Jerusalem:
"And I will make your windows of rubies, and your gates of beryl, and all your
borders of choicest stones. And all your children will be taught of the Lord,
and great will be the peace of your children."
Therefore, all my longing and desire is that our talented youth should
study, first to gain familiarity [with the texts] and then in depth, the ethical
and philosophical part of the Torah,
the Torah of the heart, compiled in concise principles by the pious one in his
book.
This study imparts ever-increasing enlightenment if time is set aside for it, an
hour or two every day, sufficient for the acquisition of a proper outlook and
inner sensitivity for the ethical and philosophical part of the Torah. This
study makes the spirit gentle and delights the soul, until one finds oneself
ready and able to inquire and examine, filled with courage and strength, for
"the Lord is my light and my salvation; whom shall I fear?"
Occupation with laws of opinions in the Torah bears fruit so that
debate, explanation, examination, and innovation in these topics will become
common to all talented youth, to the degree that he shall be well-versed in the
practical parts of the Torah. This will be beneficial in that even the practical
side of the Torah will be heightened and broadened. For this reason, when I saw
your comments on the study of Torah thought, with the questions you presented
me, I was happy and thanked God that my voice has not been a voice calling in
the wilderness, and I hope that "many will run to and fro, and knowledge will be
increased.”
But I think it best to remind you of the need to proceed gradually — in
other words, to acquire proper proficiency in any work of ethics that comes your
way, the simpler ones first, because they all come from the hearts of great
scholars, wise and most pious, and many matters of philosophy cannot be fully
understood if one's emotions are not also adequately prepared. That is why the
Torah is also called a poem, as it is called a mitzva. For this reason
one needs to call on the help of that special strength to feel the words of the
living God, which are clear only to a pure heart, and this demands the moral
aspect [of the Torah], which deals not so much with [philosophical] inquiries,
as with establishment of the soul on its inner foundations. But one should not
stop [there], but go on [to philosophical inquiries]. "Let us therefore know,
let us follow on to know the Lord; his going forth is as sure as the morning and
he shall come to us as the rain, as the latter rain that waters the earth."
B: Morality, Education, and History
This brief comment completed, I turn to your wise remarks. Even though
these and similar questions have been asked in previous generations, they need
further clarification in ours. But the content of this clarification must he to
raise the intellect to wider concepts, the purpose of both practical and
theoretical antitheses, and with a truer, more generalized view the light of
truth is revealed, making specific answers for every detail unnecessary.
Know well, my friend, that when a person takes up a particular
investigation or study, he must always prepare himself, as much as it is within
his power to do so, to be intimate with the matter under study, and if possible
to familiarize himself with the concept to the point where he feels it as [part]
of himself, his soul, and the depths of his emotions,
for if he does not make use of this capacity he will lack the major one of the
necessary conditions for the quest of truth. Therefore, when we turn ourselves
to the study of how to understand the ways of righteousness hidden in the light
of the Torah, which includes the vision of reality in relation to human morals,
theoretical and practical, personal and general, social and political, from
beginning to end, we need first of all the desire to discover the truth, to
integrate the visions of life, each according to its power. In other words, [we]
must not view moral levels according to the particular state of a special
generation, but rather in accordance with the value needed to establish this
moral [state] in practice, in accordance with its own [rules] and with the chain
of events growing out of it, to the end of time, so that its effect will always
be beneficial and enlightening.
This process must be done in carefully measured steps. If, in a particular
period of history, the attribute of mercy is overabundant,
more than is necessary for the [desirable] outcome of the distant future,
harmful and destructive forces will arrive in its wake, sometimes greater than
those of an apparent injustice.
From this you should understand that, although we are not in any way permitted
to neutralize [our] sense of justice, and the laws resulting from them, in
relation to our current actions, in accordance with those same visions
manifesting themselves in our emotions in the present,
we must not depend on them as if they were "what is above, what is
below, what came before and what will come after."
We must understand life according to two standards: how it is and how
it ought to be. The absolute [standard of] righteousness is always fixed at the
point where life should be, while the [standards of] passing righteousness, more
in line with present deeds, are built on the point where life actually is. The
great and divine Torah can not be anything but a delightful vessel that directs
and structures life for its proper state. But you must be careful not to think
of these two dimensions as independent of each other; they are connected as are
the successive horizons [seen] by the wayfarer on his distant path.
|