|
The Israel Koschitzky Virtual Beit
Midrash
Introduction to Parashat Hashavua Yeshivat Har Etzion
PARASHAT PEKUDEI
The Meaning of the Mishkan
By Rav Michael Hattin
INTRODUCTION
Parashat Pekudei constitutes the final reading of the Book of
Shemot. It opens with a tally of the various materials contributed by the people
of Israel towards the construction of the Mishkan, placing emphasis upon the
precious metals. Of special note is the calculation of the contribution of the
silver, for each adult male offered a half shekel for the fashioning of the base
sockets of the boards, and thus provided a mechanism for a census of the people
to be simultaneously undertaken. The Parasha then goes on to describe the
fashioning of the priestly garments, now repeating material first relayed in
Parashat Tetzave, before concluding with an account of the Mishkan's final
fabrication as its external envelope was erected and then its sacred vessels
were placed in their correct locations. Exultantly, the Parasha ends with the
descent of God's glory, manifest by the cloud, as His presence filled the space
of the Mishkan and temporarily prevented even Moshe from entering its
super-charged atmosphere. Proleptically, the text then informs us that all of
the future peregrinations of the people of Israel through the wilderness were
conditioned by the movements of this Divine cloud, for
…when the cloud lifted, then the people of Israel would embark
on all of their journeys. But if the cloud would not lift off, then they would
not travel until the time that it would rise. For the cloud of God's glory would
be upon the Mishkan by day, and fire would cover it at night, before the sight
of the entire house of Israel on all of their journeys (40:36-38).
A FITTING CONCLUSION
What a fitting finale to the parashiyot of the book that had so
painstakingly as well as painfully narrated the account of the birth of the
Israelite nation! Recall that Sefer Shemot had ominously opened with the onset
of the oppression in Egypt as the descendents of Ya'acov, earlier welcomed by
their erstwhile Pharaonic hosts, were soon pressed into national service and
then reduced to abject slavery. The Exodus eventually did follow, after a mighty
display of God's plagues and the first tentative spiritual steps of the people
towards freedom, but not in time to prevent centuries of servitude from leaving
their harmful mark on the crushed Israelite psyche. Though they marched forth
with a euphoric external display of confidence, the collective scars of their
experience that had been devastatingly accumulated under the Egyptian yoke – the
spiritual lassitude, self-loathing and terrible fear of embracing their destiny
– would remain with them for decades.
Nevertheless, the people persevered, crossing Yam Suf and then
entering the foreboding wilderness, all the while prodded by a Divine imperative
that was determined to bring them to Mount Sinai. There, they received the
Torah, as God revealed His guiding laws and the people enthusiastically but
anxiously pledged their fealty. At Sinai's arid and windswept base they
remained, the extent of God's lofty expectations slowly becoming more clear, and
after the debacle of the golden calf had been overcome, the people began the
project of constructing the Mishkan. The work continued apace for some six
months , and finally "on the first day of the first month" (40:17), exactly one
year to the day after God had announced to the people while yet in Egypt their
impending liberation and had bidden them to prepare the Paschal sacrifice
(12:1-3), the dedication of the complex began.
What had therefore started with abject adversity was thus
startlingly concluded with triumph, for exile and oppression were changed into
exodus and redemption, and awful self-alienation and estrangement from God were
transformed into budding self-awareness and sincere devotion to His word.
Considering the conclusion of Sefer Shemot from this perspective, a book whose
closing sections are so utterly preoccupied with things of space, yields a
remarkable analog to the world of time. The spirit of fateful and unexpected
change that colors the onset of the Purim/Pesach season, echoed in nature by the
last wet winds of interminable winter that now bow out before the warmer breezes
of hopeful spring, is paralleled exactly by this larger textual theme of
astonishing transformation!
As readers of the Torah we of course know that many challenges
await the people of Israel just over the horizon of Sefer Shemot, many setbacks
and disappointments that will delay the process of peoplehood and postpone the
realization of the national mission. But the fundamental trajectory of Israel's
course will not be altered. The guidance of the Divine cloud, first introduced
here as the conclusion to the Mishkan narratives, will remain as an ever-present
force in the people's lives, even as their childlike exhilaration dissipates and
the task of nation building is engaged in earnest.
COMPARISONS TO CREATION
In many respects, the account of the Mishkan's fabrication is
reminiscent of the Torah's narrative concerning the creation of the world. In
both instances, raw materials were transformed into finished products of
utility, beauty and purpose, through the exercise of intelligence and will and
by the spark of a creative spirit. In both instances, the process took time and
unfolded according to a hierarchical ordering principle that saved the most
precious elements for the end. And in both instances, the tangible matter,
inanimate and unresponsive of itself, was inspired with a Divine breath that
conferred life and sensation. That a similar process was at work is particularly
evident with respect to the fashioning of the first human being, for there the
text made it abundantly clear that his limp and lifeless body, formed of
elemental clay, remained inert until God blew into its nostrils "the breath of
life, so that the human became a living creature" (2:7). As the Ramban
(13th century, Spain) insightfully comments there:
The text means to imply that that God fashioned the human being
from the dust of the earth but he was lying lifeless like a senseless stone. The
Holy One blessed be He then blew into his nostrils the breath of life and he
became a living and animate being…(commentary to Bereishit 2:7).
In a similar way, Moshe erects the building envelope of the
Mishkan, now placing the sockets, the boards and the bars (40:18). He raises up
the pillars and arranges the tent-like curtains as well as their protective
covering (40:19). He places the vessels in their exact location – the ark,
table, menorah, and golden altar (40:20-27). Moshe then hangs the dividing
curtain, before setting up the altar of bronze in the courtyard (40:28). The
laver is positioned between the Mishkan and the altar (40:30) and finally the
perimeter curtains of the courtyard are set up (40:33). In other words, all of
the tangible things – the external protective structures shielding within the
precious vessels – are placed in their correct location so that the "organism"
of the building is finished. But like the lifeless body of the first human –
externally perfect, internally ordered according to a necessarily exacting plan
– the Mishkan lacks the animating spirit that God's descending cloud must then
convey:
The cloud covered the Tent of Meeting and God's glory then
filled the Mishkan. Moshe could not enter the Tent of Meeting for the cloud
dwelt upon it, and God's glory filled the Mishkan…(40:34-35).
THE ANALOG OF THE IBN EZRA
The analog first boldly drawn by the Ibn Ezra (12th
century, Spain) in his commentary to Bereishit 1:26 now returns with unusual
force:
…God forbid that the Creator should have any corporeal
qualities or tangible form. Behold the text proclaims "'to whom shall you
compare Me that I might be similar?' says the Holy One" (Yeshayahu 40:25).
Rather, because the supernal soul of man is eternal, it therefore shares an
affinity with God. So too the soul is incorporeal and it also fills the whole
body with life. The human body is thus like a miniature world. Blessed be God
who began by fashioning the great cosmos and concluded by fashioning man, the
microcosm!
For Ibn Ezra, there was a parallel to be drawn between God the
Creator and the soul of the human being. Absolute God is utterly without body or
form, but His eternal spirit of "glory" fills the material cosmos and inspires
it with life and meaning. Similarly, though we must regard Ibn Ezra's words with
caution as a provocative analog that can convey only part of the matter, the
human soul – ethereal and eternal – grants life to the human body, filling it
with potential and purpose after the manner of the Creator. And the Mishkan as
well, representing the proverbial link between heaven and earth, is thus
constructed according to a similar dynamic. We return once again to the laden
words of the Ibn Ezra, this time in his discussion of the meaning of the
Mishkan, where he advances the explanation of Rav Sa'adia Gaon (10th
century, Babylon):
The Gaon explained that there are in fact three worlds. This
terrestrial world is the macrocosm, the Mishkan is intermediate, and the human
body is the microcosm…(commentary to Shemot 25:7).
While the Gaon goes on to draw specific comparisons between
heavenly elements, the items of the Mishkan, and the organs of the human body,
occasionally introducing readings that are overly contrived or forced, who could
deny the overall persuasiveness of his linkage? As the text of our Parasha makes
so eminently clear, it is only at the moment of descent of the Divine cloud –
itself only a symbolic and intentionally amorphous manifestation of His
overwhelming presence – that the material Mishkan and its tangible vessels come
to "life".
THE PROFOUND IMPLICATIONS
We must of course ask ourselves what might be the implications
of the Ibn Ezra's and Gaon's daring theory. Why would the text invite us to
compare Omnipotent, Omniscient and Omnipresent God with the Mishkan, and then
with the human being himself? Of course, one important conclusion to be drawn
would relate to the infinite worth and ultimate value of the individual human
being, who is now recast as not only possessing God-like qualities but as a
miniature creator in his own right. But this message, while certainly critical
in a world that tends to commercialize even the most sacred things and often
tramples with impunity – in thought and in deed – upon the inviolability of the
human being, could have been conveyed without recourse to such bold metaphors.
Had the Torah not already indicated that the human being was the crown of the
cosmos, fashioned at the end of the creative process in "the image of God"? Why
the necessity of drawing challenging parallels that could just as easily be
misconstrued as sanctioning hubris and self-deification? The necessary Mishkan
linkage also remains unexplained by this approach.
Ibn Ezra's intent is perhaps something else entirely. Often we
make the mistake of believing (or do we convince ourselves?) that a relationship
with God is impossible. How can I relate to Being that is Absolute and
Unfathomable? How can I come to terms with unending space and eternity in time?
What common ground do I share with the Creator of heaven and earth whose "glory
fills the cosmos"? And what could be the meaning of His seeming preoccupation
with individual human lives and their pettiness, with detailed ritual and
minutiae, with laws that strike us as overly exhaustive and small-minded?
The answer, according to the Ibn Ezra, is that we share a
natural affinity with the Creator, for the very makeup of our being somehow
parallels His. We therefore need not resort to contrivance and artificiality in
forging a relationship with God. A cohesive connection between us and the Deity,
though sometimes difficult to believe, is actually innate to our own existence.
Our soul longs for a profound bond with God and nothing could be as
straightforward. And as for His laws, the proverbial Mishkan and its precious
Ark of the Covenant that is the location in space from whence His commands
emanate, they constitute the natural link between us. The divide between heaven
and earth, though perhaps in light of Ibn Ezra's words more apparent than real,
can be effectively bridged by the word of God that stands in between. The laws
that are focused upon even the small and seemingly insignificant parallel
Absolute God's own involvement with the material universe at large, as well as
our own preoccupation with the mundane needs of our bodies. All of them point to
a similar overwhelming reality. The Mishkan is the intermediate world, the link
between finite man and Infinite God, and by its service and the instruction
communicated from within its holy precincts, we can yet stand in the presence of
God.
Shabbat Shalom
|