|
INTRODUCTION TO
PARASHA
For easy printing, go to:
http://vbm-torah.org/archive/intparsha68/42-68matot.htm
PARASHAT MATOT
*****************************************************************
Dedicated in memory of Rabbi Aaron M. Wise, whose
yarzheit is on 21 Tammuz — The Etshalom and Wise families.
*****************************************************************
Dedicated in loving memory of Fred Stone, Ya'acov ben
Yitzhak, beloved father and grandfather, whose yahrzeit is on 25 Tammuz - Ellen, Stanley, Jacob, Zack, Ezra, Yoni,
Eliana and Gabi Stone.
*****************************************************************
TRIBES AND
TRIBALISM
By Rabbi Yaakov
Beasley
A.
INTRODUCTION
Sefer Bamidbar concludes with two parashiyyot which are normally read
together: Matot and Masei. Parashat Matot opens with the laws of vows
(nedarim) and their annulment, and then describes the war of vengeance
against Midyan and the halakhot that
arise from it. Finally, the tribes
of Reuven and Gad present Moshe with an unexpected request – the right to settle
on the eastern side of the Yarden.
Only after much reproach and negotiation is a satisfactory solution
reached. Next week, we will read Parashat Masei, which begins by listing all the
stops of the Jewish people's journey in the desert, outlines the rules governing
the division and inheritance of the Land of Israel (Eretz Yisrael), and
concludes with a prohibition for heiresses to marry out of their tribe.
Our parasha
begins simply, almost formulaically (30:2): "Moshe spoke to the heads of the
tribes (roshei ha-matot) of the Israelites, saying: 'This is the matter
that God commanded…" The Rashbam
immediately asks where we find a parasha in the Torah like Matot, which begins with a speech by
Moshe to the tribal princes, without God addressing him first. He answers that God has previously
commanded "These things you shall do for God on your festivals, besides your
vows" (29:39). It is this issue
that Moshe now refers to when addressing the judges, as the beginning of this parasha is tied to the previous
one. We can find variations on this
answer, which finds a connection between the laws of vows and the previous
verses, in the commentaries of the Ramban, the Seforno, and the Ba'al
Ha-turim.
Other commentators attempt to explain the sudden
appearance of the tribal princes when discussing the laws of vows, but nowhere
else. The Ramban suggests that this
section is not meant for the people, but for the courts. Were the Jewish people to know that
fathers and husbands have the right to cancel vows, they would not treat
nedarim with the proper gravity and respect. Given the
esoteric nature of these laws, they are told only to the worthiest people.
The Ibn Ezra provides a different explanation. Applying the principle that "There is no
set chronological order in the Torah" (Pesachim 6b), he suggests that the
section on vows is actually said after the war with Midyan, even thought the
Torah writes it beforehand. After
the war, we read that the tribes of Reuven and Gad approach Moshe, Elazar and
the princes with the request to be permitted to dwell in Transjordan, and not
Eretz Yisrael proper. In return, they vow to serve as the
front-line soldiers in the conquest of the Land of Israel. After an agreement is reached, we read
that (32:28) "Moshe commanded Elazar the Kohen, Yehoshua bin Nun, and the
patriarchal heads of the Israelite tribes concerning them" to make sure that the
tribes of Reuven and Gad fulfill their vow. These "heads of the tribes" are the ones
mentioned at the beginning of the parasha.
The Abarbanel argues that the sections are in
chronological order. Why, then, do
the tribal princes suddenly appear here?
In the preceding parasha, Pinechas, Moshe receives word
that he is about to die (27:12).
Upon hearing this, Moshe hastens to teach the tribal princes the laws of
how to absolve vows. Until this
point, Moshe has been the sole expert, but from now on, the leaders will have to
assume this role.
B.
TRIBAL IDENTITY
Irrespective of how we explain the appearance of the
tribal leaders at the beginning of our parasha, one point is clear – never
before has the Torah directed itself towards them. Until this point, the whole enterprise
of Sefer Bamidbar has been forging a unified
nation, camped around the Mishkan, its moral center. The political leadership has been Moshe
and 70 advisors, without mention of their tribal affiliations. Until now, the only mentions of the
tribes as separate entities have appeared in negative connotations - the episode
of the spies and Korach's rebellion (with the aftermath of the test of the
staffs). The army is integrated and
fights without tribal identification.
Suddenly, as the Torah describes the retaliation against Midyan, it
presents us with an entirely new military structure: "One thousand from a tribe, one thousand
from a tribe, from every tribe of Israel, you are to send to war"
(31:4). The dangers
of this new tribalism appear immediately after the war with Midyan. Gad and Reuven prefer to stay on the
eastern side of the Yarden, and Moshe immediately suspects them of abandonment
(32:6,14):
"Are your brothers then to go to war, while you stay
here?!… Now you come along, in your
father's place – a brood of sinful men! - to add more to the flaming anger of
God against Israel!"
This sudden focus on tribal identity is not limited to
this week's parasha. Next week's parasha, Masei, presents us with
the ultimate in regressive tribal identity – previously unheard-of restraints on
marriage outside of the tribe, as instituted in response to the grievances of
the Gilad family:
"God has commanded you to give our brother Tzelofchad's
inheritance to his daughters. But,
if they marry a member of another tribe, then their inheritance will be
subtracted from our fathers' inheritance, and it will be added to the
inheritance of the tribe into which they marry!"
…Moshe gave the Israelites instructions from God, saying,
"The tribe of the sons of Yosef is absolutely right! This is what God has commanded the
daughters of Tzelofchad, saying: 'They may marry anyone they please, so long as
they marry within their father's tribe… And every daughter who inherits property
among the tribes of Israel shall marry a member of her father's tribe… And inheritance will not be transferred
from one tribe to another tribe.'"
(vv. 2-3, 5-6, 8, 9)
C.
DISSOLUTION
The fissures in the national fabric that appear in our parasha do not delay in erupting. The same tribes that request from Moshe
the right to dwell in Transjordan find themselves suspected of outright
secession even before Yehoshua dies, after building a giant altar on the east
bank. The tribes that settle in
Eretz Yisrael prepare to go to
war against the eastern tribes: "The Israelites heard about it, and the entire
Israelite congregation gathered in Shilo to go up to war against them"
(Yehoshua 22:12).
The Gilad family, which triggers the regulations against
inter-tribal marriage, finds that the social ramifications of their actions
ultimately come back to haunt them:
Yiftach of
Gilad was a powerful man, the son of a prostitute, and Gilad fathered
Yiftach. The wife of Gilad gave
birth to sons. When they grew up,
they evicted Yiftach, saying, "You shall not inherit from our father…"
(Shoftim 11:1-2)
It became the
tradition in Israel that in order to avoid changes of inheritance from tribe to
tribe, a woman from one tribe would not marry a man from another. If a woman would fall in love with a
member of another tribe, she would be sent out without property, and they would
call her "a whore, lover of a man from another tribe." This is what happened to Yiftach's
mother. (Radak, ad loc)
The entire Sefer Shoftim describes the progressive
dissolution of national identity and the emergence of tribal affiliations
instead. Its first chapter describe
how some tribes work together to conquer land, but others, left to fend for
themselves, are unable to find themselves a home. Devora, in her song of triumph (Chapter
5), criticizes those tribes who could not be roused to the assistance of their
brothers. Gidon barely manages to
avoid civil war between his tribe of Menasheh and the stronger tribe of Efrayim
(8:1-3). Yiftach does not even try, and the
resulting casualties number 42,000 (12:1-6). By the end of the book (Chapters 19-21),
a civil war erupts between Binyamin and the others because of the episode of the
Concubine at Giva, killing hundreds of thousands. Apparently, only a strong monarchy and
national government is capable of putting an end to this internal
fighting.
D.
PUTTING THE PIECES BACK TOGETHER
How are we to appreciate our parasha's heavy emphasis on tribal
identity, given the knowledge that we have of its future consequences? We first note that the term used for
"tribe" in Bamidbar, "matteh,"
appears 91 times throughout the book, starting at its very beginning: "Together
with you there should be one man per tribe (matteh)" (1:4). Until now, the word for "tribe" has been
shevet. The basic meaning of
the word "shevet" is scepter, and it "eventually developed in meaning
from 'the scepter of
authority'" to signify "a group of people under the command of 'one who holds
the scepter' (Amos 1:5,
8)." Thus, the
term "shevet" connotes power and authority. However, the word "matteh,"
staff, is essentially a support (from the Hebrew root n-t-h). In the context of a describing a group,
it connotes mutual aid and sustenance. Throughout
Sefer Bamidbar, whenever the Jewish people
work in conjunction with each other, the word matteh is used. The purpose of the book, from the lengthy
depiction of the desert encampment at its beginning, to the detailed description
of the precise division of the land at its end, is to create the proper balance
(and even tension) between the individual and the community within the
nation. The Jewish people are never
to let a sense of nationalism erase their essences as unique, named
individuals. These distinctions,
however, are not to override their common nationhood. The tribes
encamp under their flags — but facing inwards, towards the Divine cloud that
hovers over the Mishkan, which overcomes their individual dissimilarities and
imbues them with a common purpose.
The full expression of the proper release of this tension comes later,
when the Jewish people choose to revoke the restrictions that develop from our
parasha:
There were no happier days for Israel than Yom Kippur and
the Fifteenth of Av (Tu be-Av).
(Mishna, Ta'anit 4:8)
What was so special about the latter? It was the day that the tribes were
allowed to intermarry freely.
(Talmud, ibid, 30b)
See Rabbi Joseph Soloveitchik's "Community,"
Tradition (Spring 1978), for a full philosophical treatment of this
dialectic. |