|
Sefer
Melakhim: The Book
of Kings
By Rav Alex
Israel
Lecture #23
- Chapter 19 – Prophet in Distress
I have acted zealously for
the Lord, the God of hosts. Israel have forsaken Your covenant,
destroyed Your altars, and killed Your prophets by the sword; and I only, am
left, and they seek to take my life. (19:10)
With these desperate lines,
an impassioned Eliyahu protests to God. What is agitating him? Is it his concern
for his personal safety? Is he furious with the nation for their religious
betrayal? Eliyahu had just experienced one of his greatest successes, bringing
the nation to an unequivocal God-awareness on Mt. Carmel. Why is he so
dejected?
How does God respond to
Eliyahu?
And He said, “Go out and
stand on the mountain before the Lord.”
And behold the Lord passed
by, and a great and strong wind rent the mountain and broke the
rocks
… but the Lord was not in
the wind.
And after the wind, an
earthquake;
- but the Lord was not in
the earthquake.
And after
the earthquake, a fire;
- but the
Lord was not in the fire.
And after
the fire, a sound of thin silence.
(v.11-12)
What does
this mean?
And how does
Eliyahu respond to God's cryptic message?
When Eliyahu
heard it, he wrapped his face in his mantle and went out and stood at the
entrance to the cave…
And He said,
"What are you doing here Eliyahu?" (v.13)
When
prompted by God as to his mode of thinking, of being, as to his mission and
essence,
Eliyahu repeats those harsh lines verbatim, word for word:
I have acted zealously for
the Lord, the God of hosts, for the Israelites have forsaken Your covenant,
destroyed Your altars, and killed Your prophets by the sword; and I only, am
left, and they seek to take my life. (v.14)
This highly enigmatic
"dialogue" stimulates many questions. What is Eliyahu trying to say to God? And
what is God communicating to Eliyahu? What is the symbolism behind the wind, the
earthquake, and the fire? And what is the small, still voice? Furthermore, when
prompted by God, why does Eliyahu repeat himself?
One final question. If you
read the chapter, you will see that God took the trouble to miraculously escort
Eliyahu to a specific location - Mt. Sinai. Why Mt. Sinai? What is the connection between
Mt. Sinai and this
story?
I would like to explain
this story in the following manner.
THE CHALLENGE AND THE
FAILURE
As we have mentioned,
chapter 19 opens as Eliyahu is escorting Achav to the royal palace in Yizrael.
Achav, after witnessing God's dramatic power at Mt. Carmel, had been swept up in the
inspiration of the moment. The king had allowed the slaughter of the
four-hundred prophets of Ba’al. And now, Eliyahu ran before his chariot as a
loyal servant:
Once he [Achav] had allied
himself with Eliyahu, he was accorded due honor as is befitting a king,
for at that moment he had repented. He [Eliyahu] sought to draw him closer to
the service of God. (Malbim 18:46)
At that moment, everything
looked positive. The king had made a clear statement to the nation, leading them
personally in the correct religious direction. However it was not so
simple:
When Achav told Izevel all
that Eliyahu had done and how he had put all the prophets [of Ba’al] to the
sword, Izevel sent a messenger to Eliyahu saying, "Thus and
more may the gods
do, if by this time tomorrow, they will not have made you like one of them.
(19:1-2)
Achav
returned to the palace excited, reporting the impressive events of the day
- the contest
and the fire from heaven - to his
wife and court advisors. But Izevel, resolute and
unimpressed, sent a message to Eliyahu that he was now subject to a royal death
warrant.
Why Izevel? Let us not
forget that the 400 prophets of Ba’al were described as "eating at the table of
Izevel" (18:19) and that it was Izevel who was zealous in banning God worship,
executing any prophet to God (18:4). Izevel is depicted as religiously
impassioned. It was she who set the spiritual tone for the kingdom. Her death
threats were to be taken seriously.
PERSONAL OR
NATIONAL?
Eliyahu leaves the borders
of Israel.
He ventures into the desert in order to die.
He has given up. At the initial level, we can demonstrate that Eliyahu is driven
by a concern for his personal welfare and that his fear expresses itself in his
desire to die. This is articulated clearly by the sevenfold repetition of the
word, "nefesh" (life):
19:2: "Your life
(nefshekha) will be like the life (nefesh) of one of
them."
19:3: Eliyahu flees "for
his life" (ve-yelekh el nafsho)
19:4: "He wanted to die
(Va-yishal et nafsho la-mut), saying, "Enough! Take my life" ("kach
nafshi")
19:10,14: (twice) "…and
they seek to take my life." (nafshi le-kachta)
In this regard, it is
worthwhile noting the inversion of the verb "kach." Due to the fact that
"they seek to take my life" (nafshi le-kachta), Eliyahu pleads with God
that HE take his life: "Take my life (kach nafshi), for I am not better
than my fathers."
Whereas this is certainly
one factor that contributes to Eliyahu's loss of confidence, however, it fails
to provide a full rationale for his behavior. After all, Eliyahu
exhibited fearless confidence when confronting Achav. He had avoided Izevel's
ban on God worship and her execution of prophets in the past. What changed?
Should the death threat alone have prompted Eliyahu's
collapse?
But there is a second
dimension that relates to the state of the nation. Eliyahu clearly expected
things to turn out differently. He assessed Achav incorrectly, anticipating a
more enthusiastic and determined response - that Achav would act decisively,
confronting and rejecting Izevel's religious stance. In contrast, he quickly
discovered that in a mere few hours, Achav's mind had been swayed in the reverse
direction.
“Izevel sent a messenger to
Eliyahu”: She saw that Achav's heart was leaning towards Eliyahu and that he
identified with his point if view. She didn't kill him immediately, for she knew
that during the night, Achav would return to his evil ways. (Malbim
19:2)
Achav and the entire
kingdom were religiously paralysed due to Izevel's overwhelming influence.
Without removing Izevel, there was no hope.
Let us recall the wider
context here. Eliyahu, in God's name, had orchestrated a three-year drought that
had brought the nation to its knees. This had culminated in the decisive
religious contest at Mt. Carmel that had exposed the falsity of the
Baal, bringing king and country to proclaim faith in God alone. It had been an
excruciating process, with Eliyahu living in exile for three years. Indeed, he
had succeeding in turning the king around. But now the entire project, this huge
educational endeavor, lay shattered, in ruins.
It was not Izevel's death threat alone.
Izevel's
confidence highlighted the understanding that she was in control, and that the
transformation of national priorities would be a more arduous, complex, and
protracted process.
To demonstrate this
perspective, listen to Eliyahu's words on Mt. Sinai:
I have acted zealously for
the Lord, the God of hosts. Israel have forsaken Your covenant,
destroyed Your altars, and killed Your prophets by the sword; and I only, am
left, and they seek to take my life. (19:10)
In these words, Eliyahu
paints the entire nation with the paintbrush of Izevel. Eliyahu equates the
entire nation with the evil queen! From his perspective, if they are compliant,
they are Izevel's accomplices.
THE CONVERSATION AT
MOUNT SINAI
This goes some way to
explaining Eliyahu's accusation at Mt. Sinai. Why does he accuse
Israel so harshly? Here is the
Malbim's reading
of that episode:
“What are you doing here
Eliyahu?”: As if to say, the role of the prophet is to be amongst the people, to
rebuke and to prophecy, not to go into seclusion in the wilderness and
mountains.
“And he [Eliyahu]
responded”: Here I am! I cannot be a prophet who teaches and guides this nation,
for my zealotry over their evil acts has killed me. I executed the prophets of
the Ba'al and now they seek to kill me! I cannot continue with my
mission.
… He showed him that God is
not to be found in the wind, earthquake, and fire, but only in the voice of
silence, and from this His messengers should learn the lesson: not to sound a
loud noise, nor to burn like fire, as did Eliyahu in his zeal for God, in his
cessation of the rain and his execution of the prophets of Ba'al. God, instead,
sends his messengers to approach the people with a quiet voice, to persuade the
nation with bonds of love and gentle words.
Did Eliyahu accept God's
message? It is clear that he did not. Eliyahu stands again a second time, at the
entrance of the cave. God asks him:
“Why are you here
Eliyahu?”: Why do you not return to your prophetic mission, to guide the
nation without zeal and turbulence?
And he repeated a second
time – that he could not abandon the way of zeal for God, for he was zealous
for God's name.
… and regarding that he
expressed his desire not to return to prophecy, due to his is zeal, He commanded
that he should anoint Elisha.
Eliyahu is a person who
speaks the language of fiery passion. He knows what is true, and when the world
around him fails to correspond to the truth that burns within, he cannot accept
the travesty. He cannot tolerate a government of Israel that
expresses values antithetical to God. He cannot stand the fact that God will sit
by and watch as the nation adopts the Ba'al as the national deity. If the Malbim
is correct, we might say that Eliyahu wishes to hold God to a standard even
higher that that which God demands of Himself!
God wishes to function in the world via the small still voice; Eliyahu wants
fire, thunder, and earthquake! He cannot tolerate a world in which Izevel can
rule with a free hand. He does not understand why God will not bring the world
to order. And even when God DOES tell him what He wants, Eliyahu informs God
that he cannot comply; he is made of different stuff. Eliyahu cannot do the
small still voice!
And so, we witness the one
time in Jewish history when a prophet effectively resigns. God accepts his
resignation, and informs him that He is to appoint Elisha in his
stead.
ELIYAHU AND
MOSHE
I am sure that in reading
these chapters you have been struck by similarities between the persona of Moshe
and that of Eliyahu.
In our perek alone, we have a series of contact points: The imagery of
the vision of an angel in the desert (like at the burning bush), a miraculous
forty days without eating or drinking, and of course Eliyahu's rendezvous with
God at Mt.
Sinai. Furthermore, the
chapter ends with an appointment of Eliyahu's disciple, Elisha, who will succeed
him, much like Joshua, Moses' student who becomes his successor. (Even the name
Elisha – "God will save" - matches the meaning of Yehoshua!) The chapter is
filled with hidden references to Moshe.
But the central scene of
the chapter is the most evocative. Moses also visited God in a cave, or a "nook"
on Mt.
Sinai.
It was at that site, that mysterious cave, that momentous debate raged between
Moshe and God regarding the forgiveness of Israel
after their great idolatrous sin of the Golden Calf. At that great epiphany,
God's presence or essence also passed by Moshe:
And God passed over his
face and proclaimed: The Lord, The Lord, a God compassionate and gracious, slow
to anger, abounding in kindness and faithfulness, extending kindness to the
thousandth generation, forgiving iniquity, transgression and sin. (Shemot
34:6-7)
Why did God lead Eliyahu to
the cave at Sinai? Because it is at that location that God revealed His identity
as a merciful God, Who practices forbearance. God wanted Eliyahu to learn from
the great prophet Moshe, the defender of Israel, who,
after the Golden Calf, invoked the covenant
in order to protect the nation.
How wide, then, is the gulf
that separates Moshe and Eliyahu! Moshe pleads for the nation. Moshe knows how
to present God’s demands to the people – he rebukes the people for their part in
the Golden Calf and kills the perpetrators. Yet it is Moshe who boldly stands
before God to demand the nation's forgiveness. Moshe defends the nation. Eliyahu
however, accuses the nation of abrogating the covenant. God directed Eliyahu to
that cave at Sinai; it should have resonated with the legacy of Moshe, the
mandate that the prophet defend the nation before God. Instead, Eliyahu chose to
bemoan, malign, and accuse Israel for their breach of the
covenant.
THREE
TASKS
And hence, God relieves
Eliyahu of his mission. He instructs him to put three processes into action,
each a response to his outrage at the religious sins of Achav's
regime:
1. To anoint Chazael as
King of Aram – a king who eventually devastates the Northern Kingdom.
2. To anoint Yehu as king
over the North – a king who eventually kills and replaced the royal House of
Omri and Achav.
3. To anoint Elisha in his
stead.
Clearly, these three
actions represent a three-pronged response to Eliyahu's outrage. Chazael
represents national punishment from an outside foreign direction. Yehu
constitutes an internal reordering or correction. The appointment of Elisha
resolves Eliyahu's personal breakdown.
THE APPOINTMENT OF
ELISHA
The scene in which Eliyahu
meets Elisha is a wonderful example of the contrast between these two men.
We meet Elisha as he is plowing with 24 oxen. It is
apparent that Elisha is a member of the family who own the farm, which would
indicate that we are dealing with a wealthy family. Elisha clearly works on the
farm and pulls his weight with the agricultural responsibilities.
In typical Eliyahu
fashion,
Eliyahu flings his cloak over Elisha and immediately, Elisha seems transformed,
abandoning his work and running after Eliyahu.
But then Elisha stops, and
says:
Let me kiss my father and
mother goodbye, and then I will follow you… He turned back from him and took the
yoke of the oxen and slaughtered them… and gave it to the people and they ate.
Then he arose and followed Eliyahu and became his assistant.
(20-22)
See how Elisha talks about
running back to "kiss" his father and mother goodbye. In fact, he doesn't go
back and engage in a fond farewell to his parents. He gets "distracted." He ends
up saying goodbye to the entire farm, taking the oxen and serving a feast for
the entire community! One wonders what Eliyahu – the ultimate loner – made of
this behavior. I presume that he was rather frustrated, puzzled by Elisha's
penchant for social niceties, when the mission of God awaited. Elisha definitely
shows a social sensitivity, an ability to understand that the divine calling
must be balanced with a human approach, which Eliyahu lacks. In this sense, he
is an apt replacement for Eliyahu, as he complements Eliyahu's uncompromising
principled stance with a more congenial approach.
EPILOGUE - PINCHAS AND
ELIYAHU
We have already compared
and contrasted Eliyahu with Moshe. However, in order to understand what Eliyahu
might have been seeking, we would do well to explore the connection drawn by
Chazal between Pinchas and Eliyahu
– both entitled as "zealots" by the Tanakh.
Pinchas entered the
national stage in a frenzy of mixed Israelite-Midyanite relationships, unions
that lead directly to worship of foreign gods (see Bamidbar 25:1-9). His
decisive, if violent, action stopped God's plagues and saved Israel. Pinchas
killed an Israelite prince who was consorting with a Midyanite woman, and this
zealotry is praised emphatically by God.
Back to the other "zealot,"
Eliyahu. Sefer Melakhi talks about Eliyahu's appearance in future
times:
Behold, I am sending to you
Eliyahu the prophet before the arrival of the Day of the Lord, that great and
awesome day. (Malakhi 3:23)
What is Eliyahu's role in
preparing Israel for that day, a day that is
depicted in harsh terms, "burning as an oven; … all the wicked will burn like
straw"? One of the problems depicted in Sefer Malachi, labelled as a
"violation of the covenant of our forefathers" (2:11), is
this:
Yehuda has broken faith;
abhorrent things have been done in Israel and Jerusalem. For Yehuda has profaned that which
is holy to the Lord – he has married the daughter of alien gods. (Malakhi
2:11)
The abrogation of the
covenant, the "betrayal of Yehuda," is the marriage to non-Jewish women who
follow alien gods. What is Eliyahu to do about this? What will he do to prepare
for God's awesome day?
He shall reconcile fathers
with their sons and sons with their fathers. (3:24)
In other words, the
children who were born to mixed marriages, in which the children have been
raised in the tradition of the pagan mothers, shall be restored to their
fathers, who will teach them to follow God!
What was Eliyahu seeking
from Achav? What was he hoping for? He was looking to detach Achav from Izevel.
He was hoping to separate this king who had "married the daughter of alien gods"
from his idolatrous wife. That is Pinchas and Eliyahu's legacy. Eliyahu led
Achav all the way to Yizrael in the hope that Achav would take the next logical
step and distance (or possibly kill) Izevel! But that didn't happen. Eliyahu's
failure in his mission of obstructing Izevel's hold on her husband, meant that
the infrastructure of the Baal was still in place, the government had not
changed, and now the spectacle of Mt. Carmel was likely to be a fleeting
episode. The change was insubstantial. It was this which caused Eliyahu's sense
of frustration and despair.
In previous chapters,
Eliyahu has exhibited similar characteristics to those of Moshe: The building of
the altar on Mt Carmel with its 12 stones reminds us of the altar and 12 stones
at Mt.
Sinai built by Moshe. At
the inauguration of the Mishkan (Vayikra 9:24), Moshe, like
Eliyahu, brings fire from heaven to consume the korbanot. In both cases,
the people react by "falling on their faces." In chapter 18, Eliyahu kills the
prophets of Ba’al much like Moshe executed the perpetrators of the Golden Calf.
The chapter ends with Eliyahu fleeing the country because he has killed the
prophets of Ba’al, much like Moshe fled Egypt because he had upset Pharaoh
through an act of murder.
Later
(Melakhim II ch.2), we will see Eliyahu splitting the Jordan river in
imitation of the splitting of the Red Sea, and, of course, neither Moshe nor
Eliyahu have a known burial place.
|