|
The Israel
Koschitzky Virtual Beit Midrash
Mikdash Yeshivat Har
Etzion
Shiur
#29: The History of the Resting of the Shekhina
(Part
XIII)
The
Dedication of the Mishkan (Part V)
Rav
Yitzchak Levi
In his commentary to the offerings of the tribal princes (Bamidbar
7:13), the Ramban proposes that the princely initiative established a
mitzva of dedicating the Temple for future
generations:
God
agreed with the princes and commanded: "They shall offer their offering, each
prince on his day" (Bamidbar 7:11). And, therefore, it is possible that
this is a mitzva for [future] generations that they should always
dedicate the Temple and the altar. And, therefore, Shlomo dedicated the Temple,
as it is written: "So the king and all the people consecrated the house of God"
(II Divrei Ha-yamim 7:5). And so, too, the men of the Great Assembly made
a dedication, as it is written: "And the children of Israel, the priests and the
Levites, and the rest of the children of the exile, kept the dedication of this
house of God with joy" (Ezra 6:16). And so too in the days of the
Messiah, as it is stated in Yechezkel (43:26-27): "Seven days shall they
make atonement for the altar and cleanse it; and they shall consecrate it. And
when these days are expired, it shall be, that upon the eighth day, and onwards,
the priests shall make your burnt offerings upon the altar, and your peace
offerings." … Now this is a mitzva, like the matter regarding those who
are ritually impure on Pesach (Bamidbar 9) and the matter regarding the
descendants of Yosef (ibid. 36), where their thoughts accorded with the supernal
intention, and we were commanded with respect to them for [future]
generations.
The details of the sacrifices, however, changed from one dedication to
the next, in accordance with the period and the context. After having compared
at length in the previous lecture the dates of the various dedications, I wish
in this lecture to briefly compare the various sets of sacrifices at the
different dedications.
I.
THE DEDICATION OF THE MISHKAN
Of
all the dedications, the dedication of the Mishkan – with its three
accounts – is described in the fullest manner: 38 verses in Shemot 40; 24
verses in Vayikra 9; and 89 verses in Bamidbar
7.
As
we have already seen at length, the resting of the Shekhina in the
Mishkan has two focuses. At the end of the book of Shemot, it is
related that the glory of the Lord filled the Mishkan – like a king who
arrives to reside in his palace:
Then
a cloud covered the Tent of Meeting, and the glory of the Lord filled the
tabernacle. And Moshe was not able to enter the Tent of Meeting, because the
cloud rested on it, and the glory of the Lord filled the tabernacle.
(Shemot 40:34-35)
In the book of Vayikra, the resting of the Shekhina focuses
upon the altar and the sacrifices:
…
And the glory of the Lord appeared to all the people. And there came a fire out
from before the Lord, and consumed upon the altar the burnt offering and the
fat, which, when all the people saw, they shouted, and fell on their faces.
(Vayikra 9:23-24)
The sum total of the sacrifices that were commanded by God was 27: one
bullock and two rams on each of the seven days of milu'im, and on the
eighth day, a calf and a ram for Aharon, and a he-goat, a calf, a lamb, an ox
and a ram for the people. In addition, the princes offered for the dedication of
the altar "twenty four bullocks, sixty rams, sixty he goats, and sixty lambs of
the first year" (Bamidbar 7:87-88) – for a total of 252 sacrifices
(besides the meal offerings that were brought in silver bowls and
dishes).
II. THE
DEDICATION OF THE FIRST TEMPLE
The
dedication of the First Temple is described in 66 verses (in I Melakhim 8
and in II Divrei Ha-yamim 5:2 – 7:11). Here, too, we find the two focuses
of the resting of the Shekhina that are familiar to us from the
Mishkan:
And
it came to pass, when the priests came out of the holy place, that the cloud
filled the house of the Lord, so that the priests could not stand to minister
because of the cloud; for the glory of the Lord had filled the house of the
Lord. (I Melakhim 8:10-11)
Now
when Shlomo had made an end of praying, the fire came down from heaven, and
consumed the burnt offering and the sacrifices; and the glory of the Lord filled
the house. And the priests could not enter into the house of the Lord, because
the glory of the Lord had filled the house. And when all the children of Israel
saw how the fire came down, and the glory of the Lord upon the house, they bowed
themselves with their faces to the ground upon the pavement, and prostrated
themselves, and praised the Lord, saying, "For He is good." (II Divrei
Ha-yamim 7:1-3)
Scripture greatly emphasizes the enormous number of sacrifices that were
brought at this dedication:
And
king Shlomo, and all the congregation of Israel who were assembled to him, were
with him before the ark, sacrificing sheep and oxen, which could not be told nor
numbered for multitude…
And
Shlomo offered a sacrifice of peace offerings, which he offered to the Lord,
twenty two thousand oxen, and a hundred and twenty thousand sheep. So the king
and all the children of Israel dedicated the house of the Lord. On the same day
did the king hallow the middle of the court that was before the house of the
Lord; for there he offered burnt offerings, and meal offerings, and the fat of
the peace offerings, because the altar of brass that was before the Lord was too
small to receive the burnt offerings, and meal offerings, and the fat of the
peace offerings. (I Melakhim 8:5, 63-64)
There are two striking points here. The first, as was already noted, is
the enormous number of sacrifices; the peace offerings alone numbered 142,000,
and Shlomo was forced to hallow the floor of the courtyard because the altar was
too small to contain all the sacrifices! The midrash explains this as an
expression of a change in the state of the people of Israel:
To
what might this be likened? To a king who set out on a journey, and meals would
be brought before him in accordance with the road and the inn. The king said to
them: This is the way you honor me and this is what you give me? Am I not the
king, and do I not rule over the kingdom? They said to him: Our lord, we are on
the road, and we have brought you in accordance with the road and the inn. When
you arrive in the city and enter your palace, you shall see how much we honor
you. So, too, when the Mishkan was set up, the princes offered a present
and a sacrifice, a bowl and a dish and a spoon, and one bullock, etc., and a he
goat, etc., and a peace offering. The Holy One, blessed be He, said to them:
This is My honor? They said to him: Master of the universe, we are in the
wilderness and we have offered before You in accordance with the wilderness.
When You enter Your palace, You will see how many sacrifices and how many
bullocks we will offer before You. This is what is written: "Do good in Your
favor to Zion; build You the walls of Jerusalem. Then shall You be pleased with
the sacrifices of righteousness, with burnt offering and whole burnt offering;
then shall they offer bullocks upon the altar" (Tehillim 51:20-21) – and
not one bullock. And so, too, you find with Shlomo who built the Temple and
wanted to bring offerings for the dedication of the Temple. See what is written
there: "And Shlomo offered a sacrifice of peace offerings, etc." And so too in
the days of Ezra… This is: "Do good in Your favor to Zion… Then shall You be
pleased." (Bamidbar Rabba 13, 1; parallel in Tanchuma Nasa
15)
The dedication of the Mishkan took place in the temporary context
of the journey through the wilderness, while the people enjoyed miraculous
Divine governance, and before they had settled in their land in the framework of
a permanent political regime. Their sacrifice was therefore small and modest, as
befits a nation in the middle of a journey. The tremendous number of sacrifices
at the dedication of the First Temple gives expression to the permanence that
had been reached at that time, the permanent kingdom of the house of David in
Jerusalem over all of Israel, who were now living in their own land, and the
transition from the temporary and movable Mishkan to the permanent Temple
on Mount Moriya. In such a situation, and in the absence of any lack of means or
money, it is fitting for the king to express his gratitude to his Creator by way
of a large royal offering.
The sacrifices were of three types: burnt offerings, meal offerings, and
peace offerings, which are especially emphasized through the noting of their
number. This arrangement is familiar to us from the offerings of the princes,
which also included these three types of sacrifices, the largest number of which
were peace offerings: "Fine flour mingled with oil… One young bullock, one ram,
one lamb of the first year, for a burnt offering… And for a sacrifice of peace
offerings, two oxen, five rams, five he goats, five lambs of the first year"
(Bamidbar 7:13, 15, 17).
It
is precisely against the background of this correspondence that we are struck by
the absence of "one kid of the goats for a sin offering" (ibid. v. 16) in the
First Temple dedication (which does appear in the later dedications, as we shall
see below). This reflection of dibura di-nedava (the free will offerings
mentioned in chapters 1-3 of the book of Vayikra, which include precisely
these sacrifices) in the dedication of Shlomo may fit in well with Shlomo's
understanding that the house of God that he had built already expressed a state
of "world peace:" the relationship between creation and its Creator has already
reached perfection, in such a manner that the Shekhina rests upon the
entire world and the service of God is based first and foremost on the
foundation of love of and connection to God.
III. THE
DEDICATION OF THE SECOND TEMPLE
The
dedication of the second Temple was much more modest in all senses. Only three
verses are dedicated to it (Ezra 6:15-17), and there is no description of
the resting of the Shekhina – because in fact the Shekhina did not
rest in the Second Temple (as we saw at length in our Lectures on Biblical
Jerusalem, 5766, lectures 25-28). In total, 712 sacrifices were
offered:
And
they offered at the dedication of this house of God a hundred bullocks, two
hundred rams, four hundred lambs; and for a sin offering for all Israel, twelve
he goats, according to the number of the tribes of Israel. (Ezra
6:17)
The returnees to Zion – few in number relative to the majority of the
Jewish people who remained in exile and lacking political independence –
dedicated the Second Temple in accordance with their means, with several hundred
sacrifices. This is a much more modest number than had been offered at the
dedication of the First Temple, although it too reflects a certain permanence
(as stated in the midrash above). It is also possible that they contented
themselves with this number because they saw themselves as only having begun to
repossess the land.
Scripture does not specify the types of sacrifices for which the
bullocks, rams and lambs were used. At the dedication of the Mishkan,
these three types of animals were used for both burnt offerings and peace
offerings, and it may be that the same is true here.
In addition, the sin offering returned at this dedication - twelve
he-goats to atone for the twelve tribes of Israel. It seems clear that these
twelve he-goats correspond to the twelve he-goat sin offerings brought by the
princes at the dedication of the Mishkan. Nevertheless, the commentators
tried to explain the sin for which they came to atone. Metzudat David (ad
loc.) writes that these sin offerings were "for all of Israel, for only Yehuda
and Binyamin returned during the Second Temple period." In contrast, R. Shmuel
Ha-Kohen
suggests – in the wake of the gemara (Horayot 6a; Temura
15b) that states that the he-goat sin offerings brought by the returnees in the
time of Ezra were "for the idols that had been fashioned during the days of
Tzidkiyahu" – that even at the dedication of the second Temple the returnees
wanted to purify themselves of all traces of idolatry, it having been one of the
causes of the destruction of the First Temple. These sin offerings express,
then, an attempt on the part of the people as a whole (through representatives
of all the tribes) to repair the sins of the past and to open "a new page."
IV. THE
DEDICATION OF THE MIKDASH OF YECHEZKEL
As
we saw in the previous lecture, our discussion of this dedication is divided
into two.
1)
THE SACRIFICES IN YECHEZKEL 43
These
sacrifices are explicitly defined as sacrifices for the consecration of the
altar:
These
are the ordinances of the altar on the day when they shall make it, to offer
burnt offerings upon it, and to sprinkle blood upon it. And you shall give to
the priests the Levites… a young bullock for a sin offering. And you shall take
of its blood, and put it on the four horns of it, and on the four corners of the
ledge, and upon the border round about; thus shall you purify and make atonement
for it. You shall take the bullock also of the sin offering, and it shall be
burnt in the appointed place of the house, outside the sanctuary. And on the
second day you shall offer a he-goat without blemish for a sin offering; and
they shall purify the altar, as they did purify it with the bullock. When you
have made an end of purifying it, you shall offer a young bullock without
blemish, and a ram out of the flock without blemish. And you shall present them
before the Lord, and the priests shall cast salt upon them, and they shall offer
them up for a burnt offering to the Lord. Seven days shall you prepare every day
a goat for a sin offering; they shall also prepare a young bullock, and a ram
out of the flock, without blemish. Seven days shall they make atonement for the
altar and cleanse it; and they shall consecrate it. And when these days are
expired, it shall be that upon the eighth day and onwards, the priests shall
make your burnt offerings upon the altar, and your peace offerings.
(Yechezkel 43:18-27)
There are several correspondences here to the days of milu'im –
the days of the dedication of the altar in the Mishkan (for comparison
see lecture no. 26): the bullock for a sin offering is burned despite the fact
that it is a sin offering offered on the outer altar; the offering of a ram for
a burnt offering for seven days; the command, "Seven days shall they make
atonement for the altar" corresponds to the command at the time of the
milu'im, "Seven days shall you make atonement for the altar"
(Shemot 29:37).
Nevertheless, there are a significant number of differences between the
two dedications. In Yechezkel, there is no ram of milu'im (perhaps
because the ram's role at the dedication of the Mishkan was connected to
the consecration of the priests, rather than the dedication of the altar), while
on the other hand, there is the addition of a bullock for a burnt offering which
was not offered in the Mishkan. Furthermore, whereas during the days of
the milu'im, a bullock for a sin offering was offered every day (ibid. v.
36), a bullock for a sin offering is offered in Yechezkel's Temple only on the
first day; during the next seven days, it is replaced with a he-goat for a sin
offering (this is the understanding of Y. Moshkowitz in the Da'at Mikra
commentary to Yechezkel 43:22).
This
he-goat for a sin offering drew special attention from the commentators. For
example, Rashi comments (v. 22): "'You shall offer a he goat' – this was not in
the Mishkan, but they will be in the future milu'im based on the
[prophetic] word." And similarly the Radak (on v. 25): "'Seven days shall you
prepare every day a he-goat for a sin offering' – there was nothing like this in
the milu'im of Moshe, nor do we find that the returnees from the exile
offered such a sacrifice… We are forced to say that this will be a novelty in
the sacrificial order of the future." As Y. Moshkowitz formulated (in his
introduction to the section, Da'at Mikra on Yechezkel, p. 356):
"Our conclusion is that there is no one law governing the dedication of the
altar, but rather a temporary ruling is issued for each dedication, based on the
words of the prophets living at the time."
2)
THE SACRIFICES IN YECHEZKEL 45
In the continuation, in chapter 45, other sacrifices are mentioned that
must be offered on various different dates – the 1st of Nisan, the
7th of Nisan, the 14th of Nisan, the days of Pesach and
the days of Sukkot:
In
the first month, on the first day of the month, you shall take a young bullock
without blemish, and purify the sanctuary. And the priest shall take of the
blood of the sin offering, and put it upon the doorposts of the house, and upon
the four corners of the ledge of the altar and upon the doorpost of the gate of
the inner court. And so you shall do on the seventh day of the month for
everyone that sins in error or in ignorance; so shall you make atonement for the
house.
In
the first month, on the fourteenth day of the month, you shall have the
Passover, a feast of seven days; unleavened bread shall be eaten. And upon that
day shall the prince prepare for himself and for all the people of the land a
bullock for a sin offering. And seven days of the feast he shall prepare a burnt
offering to the Lord, seven bullocks and seven rams without blemish daily for
the seven days; and a kid of the goats daily for a sin offering. And he shall
prepare a meal offering of an efa for a bullock, and an efa for a
ram, and a hin of oil for an efa.
In
the seventh month, on the fifteenth day of the month, in the feast, shall he do
the like the seven days; both as to the sin offering, as to the burnt offering,
and as to the meal offering, and as to the oil. (ibid.
45:18-25)
As we saw in the previous lecture, the commentators disagree (in the wake
of the gemara in Menachot 45a) regarding whether these sacrifices
are part of the sacrifices brought at the dedication, and if so, what their
relationship to the sacrifices mentioned in chap. 43 is. According to Rabbi
Yochanan (ibid.), "this section will in the future be expounded by Eliyahu,"
whereas Rav Ashi argues that "they offered milu'im sacrifices in the days
of Ezra just as they offered them in the days of Moshe." The commentators
disagree whether Rav Ashi is referring to the days of Ezra (so Rashi, ad loc.),
or perhaps this prophecy is referring to the future, as argued by the Rambam
(Hilkhot Ma'aseh Ha-Korbanot 2:14-15), and also by the Abravanel and
Malbim.
The commentators also disagree about the relationship between these
verses and the sacrifices mentioned in chap. 43. Rashi and the Radak identify
the bullock for a sin offering mentioned at the beginning of this section with
the bullock for a sin offering of the dedication of the altar mentioned in chap.
43, and the first seven days of the month of Nisan with the seven days of
milu'im described there:
"Thus
says the Lord God; In the first month, on the first day of the month, you shall
take a young bullock without blemish" –
this is the bullock of the milu'im mentioned at the beginning. It teaches
here that the milu'im are on the 1st of Nisan…
"And
so you shall do on the seventh of the month" –
This means: "And so you shall do all seven days."
And so to it says earlier: "Seven days shall they make atonement for the altar."
(Rashi, Yechezkel 45:18, 20)
According to their explanation, the two passages complement each other.
What was left unclear in chap. 43 (the date of the dedication of the altar and
some of the sprinklings of blood) is clarified in chap. 45. The Malbim (as well
as the second explanation of the Radak and the Abravanel), on the other hand,
understands that the two chapters constitute a continuum:
He
informed him about the future dedication of the Temple. He already told him
(43:18) how he is to make atonement for the altar, and this will begin on the
23rd of Adar and continue for eight days until Rosh Chodesh Nisan, as
was the case with the milu'im of Moshe. And now he informs him what he
should do from Rosh Chodesh after the altar already achieved atonement, and he
should begin to make atonement for the Temple, and this will continue until the
14th of Nisan. And then the days of dedication will begin and
continue until Shemini Atzeret. (Malbim on Yechezkel
45:18)
As for the special sacrifices that are to be brought on Pesach and on
Sukkot, it seems that their connection to the dedication of the Temple is also a
subject of disagreement. These sacrifices are totally new – there is no hint of
them in the Torah (they do not correspond at all to the musaf offerings
brought on these festivals) – and they are also different from the previous
sacrifices in that it is the prince who is commanded to bring them, and not the
priests. As opposed to the Malbim (and the Metzudat David), who sees
these sacrifices as part of the drawn out dedication of the Temple (I refer once
again to the Malbim's original explanation cited in note 21 of the previous
lecture), Rashi and the Radak imply that they are not part of the dedication
process.
***
Thus, we have completed our analysis of the dedication of the
Mishkan, and with it this year's series of lectures on the resting of the
Shekhina in Israel. I will be very happy to continue learning with you
next year as well. In the meantime, be well, and may God's blessing rest upon
you.
(Translated
by David Strauss)
|