|
The Israel
Koschitzky Virtual Beit Midrash
Parashat Hashavua Yeshivat Har
Etzion
This
parasha series is dedicated Le-zekher Nishmat HaRabanit Chana
bat HaRav Yehuda Zelig zt"l.
********************************************************
This
parasha series is dedicated in
honor of Rabbi Menachem Leibtag and Rabbi Elchanan
Samet.
********************************************************
PARASHAT
VAYIKRA
The Salt of
God's Covenant
By Rabbanit
Sharon Rimon
Parashat
Vayikra introduces the
laws of sacrifices, with chapter 2 focusing on the meal offering. Towards the
end of the chapter we find the following two laws: the prohibition of offering
leaven and honey, and the command to season the sacrifices with
salt.
Let us take a
closer look at this latter command:
And your every
meal offering you shall season with salt, nor shall you withhold the salt of the
covenant of your God from your meal offering; with all your offerings you shall
offer salt.
(Vayikra 2:13)
The verse
begins with the command to season the meal offerings, then adds a negative
corollary ("you shall not withhold"), and concludes by including all
sacrifices within this law: every sacrifice, not only meal offerings, must be
salted.
Why does the
Torah command us to put salt on the sacrifices?
Rambam, echoing
a familiar theme in his approach to the laws of sacrifices, maintains that the
law of salting is intended to create a distance between the worship of God by
Bnei Yisrael and the customs of the idolaters:
Because the
idolaters did not offer bread, but rather leaven, and they chose to offer sweet
things and would make their offerings sticky with honey. None of their
sacrifices included even a hint of salt. Therefore God forbade the offering of
any leaven or any honey, and commanded instead that salt always be present….
(Moreh Nevukhim III, 46)
A different
explanation for salting the sacrifices is to be found in the commentary of
Shadal:
To this day,
the Arabian princes, when forging a covenant, bring a vessel of salt and they
jointly eat bread dipped in salt. It was a well-known custom, in ancient times,
in the lands of the East, that a covenant would be forged with salt. And since
every sacrifice is meant to arouse favor and to appease God, and to create a
covenant between Him and us, therefore God commanded that salt be added to every
sacrifice, and he calls that salt "the salt of the covenant of your God" – for
by means of this you forge a covenant with your God.
According to
Shadal's explanation, offering a sacrifice is like the forging of a covenant,
and therefore salt must be added to it – just as it is customary to eat salt
when a covenant is forged.
However, this
merely serves to shift the question one stage backwards: why is it customary to
eat salt as a covenant is sealed? Neither Rambam nor Shadal explain the
significance of the act of salting; they merely justify it on the basis of
prevailing custom.
In this
shiur we shall attempt to understand the significance of offering the
salt, with the aid of the commentators and other verses in Tanakh that
make mention of salt.
Most verses
that mention salt involve a negative connotation. Salt appears in several
textual descriptions of destruction:
* "…and that all of its land is brimstone and
salt and burning, that it is not sown, nor does it give forth vegetation, nor
does any grass grow in it – like the overturning of Sedom and Amora…"
(Devarim 29:22)
* "For Moav shall be like Sedom, and the children
of Amon like Amora: a breeding place for nettle, and a salt pit, and a
desolation forever." (Tzefanya 2:9)
* "… He shall inhabit the parched places in the
wilderness, a salt land that is uninhabitable."
(Yirmiyahu 17:6)
These verses
suggest that there is no possibility of anything growing in a salty place; it
becomes desolate.
The same idea
is reflected in the actions of Avimelekh towards the city of
Shekhem:
Avimelekh waged
battle against the city all of that day, and he captured the city and he put to
death the people who were in it, and he destroyed the city and sowed it with
salt.
Ralbag
explains: "He destroyed the city and sowed it with salt" – he did this in order
that it would not be usable for fields and vineyards.
In the
overthrow of Sedom and Amora there is no explicit indication of the earth being
sowed with salt, but there too we find mention of salt:
His wife looked
behind her, and she became a pillar of salt. (Bereishit
19:26)
Why was Lot's
wife punished specifically in this manner? According to the commentary of Ibn
Ezra on this verse,
Sedom was destroyed with salt; Lot's wife was punished in the same manner as all
the people of Sedom, and turned into salt.
In view of the
above, we may conclude that salt kills, prevents growth, and thus causes the
place that has been salted to be desolate.
It is therefore
surprising to encounter the following story involving
Elisha:
The people of
the city said to Elisha: Behold, I pray you – the city is well situated, as my
lord sees, but the water is bad and the land causes
miscarriages.
He said: Bring
me a new flask, and place salt in it. So they brought it to
him.
Then he went
out to the spring of the water and he cast salt there, and he said: So says the
Lord – I have healed this water; there shall be no more death or
miscarriage.
And the water
was healed to this day, according to the word of Elisha which he spoke. (II
Melakhim 2:19-22)
In this
account, the same salt which had the power to destroy, now heals the water. The
Midrash explains this incident as follows:
Rabbi Shimon
ben Gamliel said: See how different God's ways are from the ways of mortals!
Mortals use something sweet to cure that which is bitter, but the Holy One,
blessed be He, cures the bitter with something else that is bitter. How is this
so? He puts something that is destructive into the thing that is destroyed in
order to perform a miracle through it… Similarly, "Then he went out to the
spring of the water and he cast salt there, and he said: So says the Lord…."
What was its healing? If salt is added to sweet water, does it not immediately
become foul? So how could this be? He placed something destructive in the
substance that was already spoiled in order to perform a miracle through it.
(Mekhilta de-Rabbi Yishmael, Beshalach)
According to
this Midrash,
salt usually spoils water, but here it was chosen for healing – not because of
its inherent healing properties, but rather the opposite. It is specifically
because salt does not sweeten water, that it was chosen here to show that the
healing of the water was miraculous.
Thus, this
narrative joins the other negative descriptions of salt.
In light of the
above, the command to add salt to the sacrifices is most puzzling. For what
reason does God command Bnei Yisrael to add salt to the sacrifices, if this
substance so strongly connotes the opposite of life and
growth?
Ramban offers
the following explanation for the sacrifices in general (Vayikra
1:9):
God commanded
that when a person sins, he brings a sacrifice; he places his hands upon it,
corresponding to the sinful act, and confesses verbally, corresponding to his
sinful speech, and then burns with fire the inner parts and the kidneys, which
are the organs of thought and of desire, and the legs – corresponding to the
person's arms and legs, which perform all of his labor, and he sprinkles the
blood upon the altar, corresponding to his own blood. All of this is so that a
person will be conscious, in performing all of this, that he has sinned to God
in his body and in his essence, and he is deserving of having his blood spilled
and his body burned, were it not for the kindness of the Creator, Who accepts a
replacement for him, and this sacrifice atones such that its blood takes the
place of his blood; its life takes the place of his life….
The person who
offers the sacrifice must feel that were it not for the offering, he himself
would be deserving of death.
Perhaps this
perspective may also be extended to the matter of the salt. The salt that is
added to the sacrifice is likewise associated in the mind of the sinner with
extinction and the prevention of life. It reinforces the consciousness that he,
in the wake of his sin, is likewise deserving of having his life cease.
A review of
some other sources reveals that salt also has some positive
characteristics:
1. "… and as
for your birth – on the day that you were born, your cord was not cut nor were
you washed for cleansing, nor were you salted at all, nor swaddled at all."
(Yechezkel 16:4)
"Salting"
appears here as one of the actions performed on a newborn baby,
as Radak explains:
"Salted" – for
salt strengthens the child's flesh and makes it harder.
This
explanation attributes to salt the role of strengthening the
skin.
The laws of
Shabbat testify to the fact that animal hides were processed using
salt:
One who hunts a
deer, one who slaughters it, and one who skins it, and one who salts it and
processes its skin. (Mishna Shabbat 7:2)
And where [the
Mishna] says, "who salts it and processes its skin" – this does not refer to two
separate actions, since the salting of the skin is one of the ways of
processing. It is mentioned to tell you that salting is itself processing.
(Rambam's Commentary on the Mishnayot)
2.
In Sefer
Iyov, salt is mentioned in the context of its known function of enhancing
the taste of food:
Can that which
is bland be eaten without salt? (Iyov 6:6)
Salt is not
just another spice that gives flavor to food; it is the most basic spice, an
essential addition.
3.
A Midrash
suggests additional significance to the wife of Lot being transformed
specifically into a pillar of salt:
"He has made a
remembrance of His wonders" (Tehillim 111:4) – when [God] overturned
Sedom, too, He left a memorial: "And his wife looked behind her, and she became
a pillar of salt", and to this time that pillar of salt is still
standing…(Sifrei de-Aggadeta al Ester – Midrash Panim Acherim
nusach 2 parasha 5)
According to
this Midrash, the transformation of Lot's wife into a pillar of salt was not
part of the general destruction of Sedom, but rather a special act with its own
special purpose: to serve as a monument of memorial to the overturning. Salt
exists forever, and therefore the "pillar of salt" will remain forever, as
testimony to the overturning of Sedom.
This Midrash
points to a most positive characteristic of salt:
It exists
forever. Moreover, it also has the power to preserve other things such that
they, too, exist forever. Vegetables, meat and fish, which would spoil quickly
if left in their natural state, can be pickled with salt and thereby preserved
for long periods of time.
Thus, one of
the positive qualities of salt is that it causes things to continue to
exist.
Perhaps, then,
the commandment to salt the sacrifices is related to these positive qualities of
this substance:
a. Some
commentators suggest that the reason for salting the sacrifices is because salt
enhances the flavor of foods:
"The covenant
of your God" – I have brought you into the covenant and caused you to swear that
you will not offer up bland [offerings] not fit to be eaten, for this shows lack
of respect. (Ibn Ezra on Vayikra 2:13)
…and on the literal level: the reason for
salt with the sacrifices is because it would not be respectful, for an offering
to God, to be bland and without salt. The Torah is teaching the proper manner
for giving honor to the Heavenly King, similar to the manner of giving honor to
a mortal king… (Rabbeinu Bachye)
At first
glance, this seems very odd: surely God does not actually "eat" the sacrifices,
such that it is necessary that they be tasty?!
Obviously, this
is not what the commentators are suggesting.
Rabbeinu Bachye
is teaching us an important principle: "The kingdom of God is similar to mortal
kingdom." How is a person to give honor to God's kingship? In the same way that
he gives honor to a mortal king. This is the way in which people usually express
honor, and therefore it is appropriate that we show the same honor towards God.
Therefore, salt must be added to the sacrifice, since it enhances the flavor –
even though God does not eat of the sacrifice and has no need for it to be
"tasty."
Sefer
ha-Chinukh, too, explains that salting is meant to enhance flavor, but the
significance of this is treated slightly differently:
One of the
roots of the commandment of sacrifice is to repair and straighten the soul of
the person who offers it. Therefore, to arouse the soul of the person who brings
the sacrifice, he is commanded to offer things that are good and tasty and
enjoyed by him, and the [requirement of] salt with it is likewise from this root
– in order that the action should be complete, within nothing lacking from it in
the manner of human custom. This causes the person to be more strongly drawn to
it, for anything that is without salt will not be pleasing to a person – neither
in taste nor in aroma.
According to
Sefer Ha-Chinukh, the salting is meant not to honor God, but rather in order
that the person himself will feel that he has offered up something worthy, and
therefore he will feel more closely bound to his sacrifice and its
significance.
b. Another
positive characteristic of salt is its preservative power. According to Sefer
ha-Chinukh, this quality is most appropriate in the context of the
sacrifices:
…And
furthermore, there is another matter alluded to in salt, for salt preserves
everything, saving it from being lost and rotten. Likewise, through his
sacrifice, a person is saved from being lost, and his life is preserved, and
remains forever.
The sacrifice
makes atonement for the person, thereby facilitating his continued existence.
From this perspective, offering the salt symbolizes the significance of the
sacrifice: just as salt allows things to continue to remain intact, so too the
sacrifice allows the person to continue to exist. Moreover, it facilitates the
eternal existence of his soul.
The review of
different verses showed us some of the inherent qualities of salt – some
negative, some positive. On the one hand, salt destroys and does not allow
growth; on the other hand, it exists forever and also preserves other things,
and it gives flavor to food.
On the basis of
these qualities we have attempted to explain why God commanded that the
sacrifices be salted, and several explanations have been offered, each relating
to a different quality of salt.
However,
attention should be paid to the fact that these qualities are not only different
from one another, but in fact mutually contradictory. Existence and destruction
are opposites. Hence, their mutual identification with salt is quite curious,
and must certainly have some significance.
Perhaps it is
precisely the fact that salt has these two opposite aspects – positive and
negative, preserving and destroying – that is the reason for God's requirement
that it be offered upon the altar:
… For salt is
(sea)water which, through the power of the sun upon it, becomes salt. Water, in
its original form, gives life to the land and causes things to grow, but after
it becomes salt, it destroys every place and burns it, such that nothing can be
sown or grown.
And behold – the covenant is made up of all the attributes… like salt, which
gives flavor to all foods, and can either preserve or kill with its saltiness…
Therefore it says, concerning the sacrifices (Bamidbar, ad loc.), "It is
an eternal covenant of salt" (literally – "A covenant of salt for the world") –
for the covenant is the salt of the world, by means of which it is either
preserved or cut off…. (Ramban, Vayikra 2:13)
Rabbeinu Bachye
elaborates on this Ramban, as follows:
Salt possesses
two contrary, contradictory powers, and they are water and fire, which
correspond to the two qualities by virtue of which the world exists – the
attribute of mercy and the attribute of strict justice. For this reason, God
says "the salt of the covenant of your God": the covenant of God is compared to
salt, because through this the world is either preserved or destroyed, as our
Rabbis taught: [God] saw that [the world] could not exist through strict justice
[alone]; therefore He added to it the attribute of mercy. Similarly, salt can
preserve or kill off. It preserves meat for a long time, and gives flavor to all
foods, but it also kills, for a place that has been salted will not give forth
any vegetation….
According to
Ramban, salt possesses two contradictory qualities: it preserves, but also
kills. In this sense, salt is similar to the covenant. God's covenant preserves
and gives life (if its conditions are upheld), but it can also destroy (if it is
violated). Thus we may say that the covenant is the (spiritual) "salt" of this
world.
Salt is eaten
at the forging of a covenant because of the conceptual similarity between salt
and covenant. Salt is also offered with the sacrifices, because the sacrifices
themselves are an important covenant. If the commandments of the sacrifices are
fulfilled properly, the person continues to exist, and the world continues to
exist. If the sacrifices are not performed properly, heaven forefend, then there
is no life.
The sacrifice
expresses the covenant between God and man, and it expresses the combination of
the attribute of strict justice and the attribute of mercy. On one hand, there
is justice – the person is guilty for his sin; perhaps he is even deserving of
death, and the sacrifice takes his place. On the other hand, there is mercy:
there is the possibility of atoning for the sin, thereby allowing continued
existence.
In addition,
Rabbeinu Bachye clarifies the fundamental issue of the combination of two
opposite poles – the attribute of justice and the attribute of mercy. The world
exists by virtue of this combination.
Salt, too,
embodies the combination of two opposites: continued life, and the end of life.
We ask ourselves, how can this combination be possible? Let us consider the
action of salt. Organic substances undergo change: they decay and rot. Salt
preserves them by preventing the change and rotting of the substance. At the
same time, the rotting of organic substances is what gives rise to new growth.
In order for a plant to grow, many changes must take place. The seed must
undergo a process of rotting in the earth in order to sprout a new plant.
"Organic compost" rots and decomposes and is absorbed into the ground; this
fertilizes the ground and facilitates new growth.
Salt prevents
matter from undergoing change and thereby prevents its rotting, but by the same
token it prevents the possibility of growth.
Thus, just as
growth necessarily involves a process of disintegration, so the salt's property
of drying up all life is closely bound up with its property of extending and
preserving.
Salt, then,
represents the idea that existence and extinction, which appear to be opposites,
are actually connected at their root. Both flow from the same source. The
essence of a person's life, too, is a combination of existence (a living body,
and – particularly – the soul, which enjoys eternal existence), and extinction
(the body which eventually decays).
The attributes
of justice and mercy are likewise two manifestations of God's rule of the world.
Their source is one and the same, although in our reality they are expressed as
opposites.
The sacrifice
is not only "atonement for sin,"
but also acknowledgement of God's Kingship over the whole world, with all its
seeming contrasts and contradictions. When the sacrifice is offered, salt must
also be offered, so as to express the idea that everything that happens in
reality is connected to the same Source – to God.
This idea is
alluded to in the words of Keli Yakar:
In order to
declare God's Kingship over all the seeming opposites in the world… and behold,
salt contains within itself two opposites. It has the power of fire and heat,
and the quality of water, such that the Kabbalistic masters taught that it
corresponds to the attribute of justice and the attribute of mercy. Therefore it
is called "the covenant of your God," for by offering it we forge a covenant
with God, declaring His rulership over all opposites.
According to
Keli Yakar, the sacrifice comes to show that we are actively acknowledging God
as King over the entire world. This means that we acknowledge God's rule over
all the forces in the world. He rules over even those things that are opposite
to one another and appear to be separate, independent forces. He rules over
water and over fire, over good and evil, the attribute of strict justice and the
attribute of mercy.
Salt symbolizes
the profound, existential connection between the attribute of justice (expressed
in extermination) and the attribute of mercy (expressed in existence), and
therefore it is appropriate that salt be offered upon the altar, to show that
God rules over all the various forces in the world.
In summary,
when the Torah commands us to offer salt, it does not tell us only that "with
all your offerings you shall offer salt," but also emphasizes this requirement,
formulated both in positive terms ("With all your offerings you shall offer
salt") and in negative terms ("You shall not withhold the salt of the covenant
of your God"). This highlights the importance of this
command.
In addition,
the Torah makes use of a special expression: "the salt of the covenant of your
God." Salt is not merely one of the details of the sacrificial ceremony; it is
"the covenant of your God." It symbolizes eternal existence, just as the
"covenant of your God" is eternal.
The sacrifice
is an expression of the eternal covenant between God and Israel, and therefore
it is appropriate that it include salt, which symbolizes
eternity.
Salt is a
symbol not only of eternal existence, but also of extermination. As we have
seen, the element of extermination and the element of decay are the basis for
new growth. Decay and growth, which seem to be opposites, actually arise from
the same Divine source. The offering of salt strengthens our awareness that all
of reality, with all of its seeming contradictions, arises from the same Divine
Source, from the same God Who rules over the world with His attribute of justice
and His attribute of mercy.
Translated by
Kaeren Fish
|