|
PARASHAT NITZAVIM-VAYELEKH
"Hak'hel:" The Septennial National Assembly
By Rav Elchanan Samet
a. Why is the Mitzva of Hak'hel not Included in the Speech of
the Mitzvot?
In our parasha, the long speech of the mitzvot is over; the
"words of the covenant… in the land of Moav" are completed. Moshe, the faithful
shepherd, who has been exhorting the people of Israel since the first day of the
month of Shevat, has reached the day of his departure from them - the day of his
death, when he offers his final words:
(31:1-2) "Moshe went and spoke these words to all of Israel. He
said to them: I am a hundred and twenty years old today; I can no longer go out
and come in, and God has said to me: You will not cross over this
Jordan."
The Ramban comments on the words "Moshe went" in verse 1 as
follows:
"When he completed all his words, all those who had stood
before him - and the children and the women – went to their tents… after
accepting the covenant… The text tells us that now Moshe left the Levite camp
(where he was stationed while declaring the covenant) for the Israelite camp, to
pay his respects to them, LIKE ONE WHO WISHES TO TAKE LEAVE OF HIS FRIEND, AND
COMES TO ASK HIS PERMISSION."
In these parting words, close to the very end of the entire
Torah, another mitzva appears:
(31:9) "Moshe inscribed this Torah and gave it to the kohanim,
the sons of Levi, who carried the Ark of God's Covenant, and to all the elders
of Israel.
(10) Moshe commanded them, saying: At the end of seven years,
at the time of the Shemitta year on the festival of Sukkot,
(11) when all of Israel come to present themselves before the
Lord your God at the place which He will choose,
you shall read this Torah before all of Israel, in their
ears.
(12) Gather the nation – the men, the women and the children,
and the strangers who are among you
in order that they may hear and in order that they may learn to
fear the Lord your God, and observe to perform all the words of this Torah.
(13) And their children, who have not known, will hear and
learn to fear the Lord your God
all of the days that you live upon the land which you are
passing over the Jordan to possess."
Why does Moshe teach this mitzva specifically here, in his
parting words? Why is it not included among the many mitzvot listed in chapters
12-26?
The answer arises from the verses themselves. This mitzva
(named "hak'hel," gather, because of the opening word of verse 12), which
entails reading the Torah before all of Israel at the end of every seven years,
at the time of the Shemitta year, on the festival of Sukkot, is connected to the
Sefer Torah that Moshe has written and has just handed over to the kohanim and
the elders (9). These kohanim and elders are the addressees of Moshe's next
words: (10) "And Moshe commanded THEM saying…", and the mitzva itself concerns
reading "THIS Torah" – the Torah that has just been handed over to them. The
completion of the writing of the Torah could not have been achieved until
Moshe's last day, for it had to include his previous speeches, and therefore on
that same day he commands that "this Torah" be read every seven years.
The connection between verse 9, describing the inscription of
the Sefer Torah and its transmission to the kohanim and elders, and the mitzva
of hak'hel which follows immediately afterwards (10-13) is even stronger. In the
mishna describing the fulfillment of the mitzva of hak'hel (Sota 7:8), we are
told:
"At the end of the first day of the festival of Sukkot, at the
beginning of the eighth year [the seventh year having just ended], they make him
[the king] a wooden podium in the courtyard [of the Temple] and he sits upon it…
The chanter of the Great Court takes a Sefer Torah and gives it to the head of
the Court, and the head of the Court gives it to the deputy Kohen Gadol, and the
deputy Kohen Gadol gives it to the Kohen Gadol, and the Kohen Gadol gives it to
the king, and the king stands and receives it and reads…."
The commentators and halakhic authorities debate the source of
the custom that it is the king who reads the Torah before the nation – mentioned
nowhere in the actual Torah text. We may further ask, what is the meaning of the
ceremonial passing of the Sefer Torah from one functionary to the next? The
Seforno finds a source for this dual passing in verse 9, which precedes the
mitzva of hak'hel:
"'And Moshe inscribed this Torah and gave it over to the
kohanim, the children of Levi' – from whose hands the king receives it to read,
as we learn [in the mishna], 'The deputy gives it to the Kohan Gadol, and the
Kohen Gadol to the king.'
'And to all the elders of Israel' – from whose hands the
kohanim receive the Torah at hak'hel, as we learn, 'The chanter of the Great
Court gives it to the head of the Court, and the head of the Court to the
deputy.'"
Thus we learn that the giving over of the written Torah by
Moshe to the kohanim and the elders is itself part of the mitzva of hak'hel. The
receivers of the Torah for safekeeping – the kohanim and elders – are therefore
the ones commanded by Moshe ("and Moshe commanded THEM") to transmit the Torah
in their trust to the person who is destined to replace Moshe as leader of the
nation, namely, the king. Indeed, the special status of the king in the mitzva
of hak'hel as Moshe's successor is almost explicit in the words of the Rambam:
"The king is the agent who gives voice to God's words."
This connection that we have just discovered – between the
completion of the writing of the Torah and the mitzva of reading it for all
generations every seven years – explains the real reason why the mitzva of
hak'hel appears right at the end of the Torah. This is a general mitzva that is
meant to reinforce the KNOWLEDGE OF THE ENTIRE TORAH and the OBSERVANCE OF ALL
ITS MITZVOT, as the Torah itself teaches:
(12-13) "In order that they will hear and in order that they
will learn… and to observe to perform all the words of this Torah… all the days
that you live upon the land…."
b. The Reason for Hak'hel According to Rambam
What is the reason for the mitzva of hak'hel? The question
seems redundant, since the Torah itself explains the reason at length:
(12) "Gather the nation – the men, the women and the children,
and the strangers who are in your midst,
in order that they may hear and that they may learn to fear the
Lord your God, and they will observe to perform all the words of this Torah.
(13) And their children who have not known – they will hear and
will learn to fear the Lord your God
all the days that you live upon the land which you are passing
over the Jordan to possess."
Fascinatingly, aside from this overt and explicit reason, the
Rambam (Hilkhot Chagiga 3:5-6) hints at another, special reason:
"The reading and the blessings are intoned in the holy tongue,
as it is written, 'And you shall read THIS Torah' – in its original
language.
Even though there may be natives of other lands and strangers
who are not familiar with the holy tongue, they must ready their hearts and
listen with their ears, to hear with fear and awe, and tremulous joy, LIKE THE
DAY WHEN THE TORAH WAS GIVEN AT SINAI.
Even great sages, who know the entire Torah, are [nevertheless]
obligated to listen, with great and intent concentration.
One who is not able to hear – he concentrates inwardly on this
reading, which the Torah establishes solely for the purpose of strengthening the
true faith.
HE SHOULD REGARD HIMSELF AS THOUGH HE HAS JUST NOW BEEN
COMMANDED, AND FROM THE MOUTH OF GOD HIMSELF, FOR THE KING IS AN AGENT TO MAKE
GOD'S WORDS HEARD."
There is no doubt that Rambam regards the mitzva of hak'hel as
a ceremony of renewal of the covenant of Sinai. He says this twice: "They must
ready their hearts and listen with their ears… LIKE THE DAY WHEN THE TORAH WAS
GIVEN AT SINAI," and "he should regard himself as though he has just now been
commanded, and from the mouth of God Himself, for the king is an agent to make
God's words heard." The king who rfthe Torah is like Moshe, who declares God's
words to the people, and the entire experience is therefore a sort of return to
the giving of the Torah at Sinai.
This perception of the mitzva of hak'hel has one fundamental
ramification: presence at the hak'hel gathering IS NOT MEANT TO INCREASE
KNOWLEDGE, BUT RATHER TO DEEPEN THE EXPERIENCE. The experience does not
necessarily require an understanding of the words being read by the king, but
rather a psychological preparation and internalization of the great significance
of the occasion itself.
c. Hak'hel and the Covenant on the Plains of Moav
What is unique to the mitzva of hak'hel is the requirement that
the entire nation be gathered – men, women and children, as well as the
strangers. There is no other mitzva that involves such all-inclusive
attendance.
The value of the Torah study that takes place at that occasion
cannot be sufficient explanation for this mass assembly. There will, of
necessity, be several groups among the population whose learning will not
increase in any way from this event: firstly, the children (see Chazal's
teachings in this regard); secondly, those who do not understand Hebrew; and
thirdly, those who stand at a great distance from the place where the Torah is
being read (and some people of necessity will stand at a great distance because
of the very demand that the entire nation attend). Thus, we are forced to admit
that this mitzva must have a reason that relates to the actual gathering of the
entire nation for the purposes of reading the Torah.
Such a gathering already took place once before, at Mount Sinai
(Shemot 19:2-3): "And Israel encamped facing the mountain… Thus shall you say to
the House of Jacob, and tell to the children of Israel." But the entire nation
is mentioned again, in more specific form, at a slightly different ceremony –
the forging of the covenant at the plains of Moav, which represented a renewal
of the covenant of Chorev, and was made by Moshe:
(29:9) "You are all of you standing today before the Lord your
God: Your leaders, your tribes, your elders and your officers, EVERY MAN OF
ISRAEL.
(10) YOUR CHILDREN, YOUR WIVES AND THE STRANGERS who are in the
midst of your camp, from the hewers of wood to the drawers of water.
(11) That you may enter into the covenant of the Lord your God,
and into His oath which the Lord your God made with you this
day."
At the covenant of the plains of Moav, the same four types of
people are mentioned that appear in the mitzva of hak'hel:
"the men" – "every man of Israel"
"the women" – "your wives"
"the children" – "your children"
"the stranger who is in your gates" – "the stranger who is in
the midst of your camp."
Thus, the mitzva of hak'hel is also a return to the covenant of
the plains of Moav, and both of these are a return to the covenant of
Chorev.
This explanation of the mitzva of hak'hel provides an
additional reason for its location after all the speeches of the covenant made
in Moav, in chapters 27-30. The mitzva of hak'hel must come after the forging of
the covenant on the plains of Moav because it is meant to bring the nation back,
for all eternity, to the forging of that covenant.
d. Hak'hel and Moshe's Description of the Revelation at
Chorev
In chapter 4 of Sefer Devarim (1-40), we find Moshe's second
speech of this Sefer, and in verses 9-15 of that speech we find a section
dealing entirely with the Revelation at Chorev and the obligation to remember
it. There is an obvious similarity between the description of the events at
Chorev in that section and the mitzva of hak'hel. Let us compare them:
Parashat Vaetchanan (4:10) – Chorev
"GATHER to me THE NATION, THAT I MAY MAKE THEM HEAR My
words
that they may LEARN THEM, TO FEAR ME
ALL THE DAYS THAT THEY LIVE UPON THE LAND
And they will TEACH THEM TO THEIR CHILDREN."
Parashat Vayelekh (31:12-13) – "hak'hel"
"GATHER THE NATION… in order that THEY MAY HEAR
and in order that THEY MAY LEARN TO FEAR GOD your God…
AND THEIR CHILDREN… will hear AND WILL LEARN to fear…
ALL THE DAYS THAT YOU LIVE UPON THE LAND…."
This interesting parallel teaches us that the gathering for the
revelation of Chorev was itself carried out by a hak'hel command, and likewise
that the aims of the revelation at Chorev were the same as those of reading the
Torah at the hak'hel gathering. The focus was not so much the actual words that
would be spoken on these occasions, but rather the formative experience that
they entailed, bringing the participants to a fear of God.
e. Why is Hak'hel No Longer Observed or Commemorated?
The mitzva of hak'hel, in its proper form, is connected to the
Temple, to which the nation of Israel makes its pilgrimages: "When all of Israel
come to present themselves to the Lord your God, at the place that He will
choose." It may also be related to the proper observance of the Shemitta year:
"At the time of the Shemitta year." From the words of the Sages, we learn that
the king plays a central role in the fulfillment of this mitzva. The lack of one
or more of these components dictates that the mitzva no longer applies.
Until the end of the Second Temple period, this mitzva was
performed properly, as described in the Mishna in Sota:
"King Agrippas stood and received it and read while standing
[although, strictly speaking, he could have sat while reading], and the Sages
praised him. And when he reached the verse, 'You shall not place upon yourselves
a gentile man,' his eyes flowed with tears [for he was a descendant of Herod,
the Edomite]. They said to him: Fear not, Agrippas, you are our brother, you are
our brother."
Since the destruction of the Second Temple, and the loss of
Israelite sovereignty over the land, this mitzva has not been observed.
Why did the Sages not enact some law that would commemorate the
mitzva of hak'hel after the Destruction? In the next sections, we shall explore
the thesis that the profound impression made by the mitzva of hak'hel on Jewish
customs and lifestyles has lasted from the Second Temple times until today.
f. The Diverse Customs of Torah Reading
The custom of the Jews of Babylonia was to complete a cycle of
Torah reading every year, while the communities of Eretz Yisrael completed it
every three years (Megilla 29b). It seems that this custom went back to the most
ancient times. Indeed, various sages brought support for it from the Mishna and
from the Tosefta, which were composed in Eretz Yisrael.
But in a composition from the period of the Geonim – "The
Differences between the Easterners and People of Eretz Yisrael" – we find a
slightly different testimony concerning the custom prevalent in Eretz Yisrael
(Margaliot ed., p.88):
"The easterners (=communities of Babylonia) celebrate Simchat
Torah every year, while the communities of Eretz Yisrael celebrate it once in
THREE AND A HALF years."
These sources seem to point to a lack of uniformity in the
custom of Eretz Yisrael. The length of a Torah-reading cycle was somewhere
between three years and three-and-a-half years, with no uniformity between the
different areas, and with different parashot being read on the same Shabbat in
various locations.
The testimonies that have since been added from ancient
archives, concerning the division of Torah readings, confirm this strange
situation. Some sources indicate that the Torah was divided into 167 "sedarim,"
while other sources count 154 "sedarim." Issachar Joel found a source that
mentioned a division into 141 readings.
This state of affairs has led most scholars of recent years to
the problematic conclusion that there was no binding rule pertaining to the
custom of reading the Torah among the communities of Eretz Yisrael. Complete
anarchy ruled over this important sphere of communal and synagogue life.
This is most surprising: how could the Tanaim and Amoraim who
lived in Eretz Yisrael, as well as the Sages who succeeded them, allow such a
lack of uniformity, while in other areas rules were made and customs established
to regulate synagogue activities? More perplexingly, parallel to the custom of
Eretz Yisrael there was the firmly established, regular and systematic
Babylonian reading custom. Could the sages of Eretz Yisraenot adoptthe
principles of the Babylonian system and adapt them to a three-year reading
cycle?
g. Two Torah-reading Cycles in a Single Shemitta Cycle
In his article, "Sidrei Keriat ha-Torah be-Eretz Yisrael: Iyun
Mechudash" (Tarbiz 67, 5758, pp. 167-187), Prof. Shelomo Naeh proves that the
picture painted by the scholars is inaccurate. The Eretz Yisrael reading custom
was attached to fixed times in the calendar, and was comprised of two reading
cycles that together made up seven years – a single Shemitta cycle. Naeh
writes:
"It appears that these divisions of the parashot do not present
different systems of Torah reading, but rather different components of a single
custom, adapted to the needs of different years… There could be only one purpose
of such a system: to adapt the reading cycle to an event – or to events – in the
calendar. In other words, the cycle is geared towards a certain point on the
calendar, and in order to reach that point with precision, it was necessary in
certain years to add to or diminish from the number of 'sedarim' to be read on
Shabbatot."
Further on, Naeh presents us with the fact that there is a
fixed ratio between the number of sedarim in each of the three reading systems:
the different between 141 and 154, and between 154 and 167, is 13:
"It seems, therefore, that these were not three separate
systems, but rather just two (which were really one and the same): in one system
a complete reading cycle comprised two sets of 154 readings, while in the other
the greater cycle was composed of a set of 141 sedarim, in the first round,
followed by a set of 167 sedarim in the second round."
In Eretz Yisrael the custom was to interrupt the regular weekly
readings not only on a festival that fell on Shabbat (which was customary in
Babylon, too), but also on a Shabbat that was Rosh Chodesh, on the Shabbatot of
Channuka and Purim, and on the Shabbatot when the four special parashot were
read. Naeh makes some calculations and discovers that "the total number of
special Shabbatot that can fall in a single year is, at most, twelve, and, at
least, eight" – according to the custom of Eretz Yisrael, obviously. According
to his calculation:
"It turns out that the numbers 154 and 141 are precisely suited
to the maximal number and minimal number of 'sedarim' that may be read in two
cycles within seven years… The obvious question, then, is where the system of
167 'sedarim' fits into this seven-year system…
Within the framework of seven years, it is difficult to know,
in the first few years, how the coming years will fall and exactly how many
'sedarim' will fill them. This is a real problem where the calendar is not fixed
and systematic, but rather based principally on sighting of the moon, and it
becomes much more difficult if there is no way of predicting when leap years
will fall… as was the case in the period of the Mishna and the Talmud… Since the
only point to which the cycle as a whole was geared was the end of the seven
years, the guiding principle was a pragmatic 'postponement of problems' wherever
possible, or – in other words – to concentrate the greatest possible measure of
flexibility towards the end of the cycle… Therefore, instead of two cycles of
154 'sedarim,' it was preferable that the first cycle consist of the smallest
number of 'sedarim' – 141, with their reading following a completely continuous
progression, with no divisions and no joining of 'sedarim,' leaving the
possibilities that had not been used up in this round (i.e., dividing some of
the 'sedarim' into two) to add to the second round. The second round, in which
all the adjustments of the readings to the yearly calendar were made, would
therefore have to consist of 167 'sedarim… The three types of cycles of
'sedarim'… therefore represent two possibilities for reading the entire Torah
twice during seven complete years… This is an exact system that is intended to
conclude with fixed regularity and at a known date. The cycle takes seven years…
Despite the clear integrity of the system, it still allows for differing
customs: some will read the Torah in two equal cycles of 154 'sedarim,' while
others will read in unequal cycles – 141 'sedarim' the first time and 167
'sedarim' the next time. Clearly, then, the completion of the reading of the
Torah after the first round will not take place at the same time for both types
of communities, and the 'sedarim' read on each Shabbat will likewise not be the
same… What we have here is a discrepancy in the internal arrangement of a
single, fixed and universally observed cyclical regularity."
h. Torah Reading on Shabbat, and the Mitzva of Hak'hel
What does the above discussion have to do with our subject –
the mitzva of hak'hel? Let us continue together with Naeh:
"The question arises: what is that fixed date when the
seven-year cycle of reading is meant to conclude? … The cycle of Torah reading
taking seven years can have only one explanation, which is clear to us from the
mitzva in the Torah – the mitzva of hak'hel…
The date of hak'hel is after the last day of the festival of
Sukkot in the eighth year, following the Shemitta year. The seven-year reading
cycle is therefore meant to conclude – like its one-year counterpart – on the
day after the festival of Sukkot: the day of 'Simchat Torah.' Both customs seem
to arise from the same parasha in the Torah, in which Moshe commands that the
entire Torah be read once every seven years. It is reasonable to assume that the
Sages who adopted this model [a reading over the period of seven years]
preferred to spread the reading over the entire seven-year period, in order to
fulfill the command, 'In order that they will hear and in order that they will
learn….' There is no point in dividing the Torah in such a way that it will be
read in a single seven-year cycle, since the portions yielded by such a division
are too short; therefore, they chose the system of two cycles that together make
up seven years.
… The fact that this cycle is geared towards hak'hel indicates
its connection to that ancient Temple custom, and it is therefore proper that we
consider the possibility that the source of the Eretz Yisrael reading cycle is
extremely old – dating perhaps to the time of the Second Temple itself. If this
is so, it seems that we may attribute it to the fact that the fulfillment of the
mitzva of hak'hel in its literal sense – i.e., reading the entire Torah on a
single day once every seven years ('You shall read this Torah…') - is not a
simple matter. It is not far-fetched to suggest that for this reason, and in
order to fulfill properly the learning purpose set down for this mitzva in the
Torah – 'In order that they shall hear and in order that they shall learn... and
observe to perform all the words of this Torah' – there developed, alongside the
one-time reading at the hak'hel, a system of continuous Torah reading in regular
doses. This system was naturally spread over the Shabbatot of the seven years
between one hak'hel and the next.
The Babylonian one-year cycle may also be explained in light of
what we have said here. This custom is the counterpart of the seven-year custom,
and is likewise born of the ancient mitzva of hak'hel. But the Babylonians,
unlike their brethren in Eretz Yisrael, did not preserve the connection to the
seven-year hak'hel cycle, choosing instead to arrange the Torah reading in a
completely fixed and uniform one-year system. At the same time, the Babylonian
communities, too, were careful to preserve the point of attachment to the
ancient system of reading. Like the seven-year cycle, the one-year cycle also
begins on the Shabbat following the festival of Sukkot… The day of 'Simchat
Torah' of the Babylonian communities is therefore a one-year mirror image of the
ancient day of hak'hel."
The connection between the mitzva of hak'hel and the enactment
of reading the Torah on Shabbat as a complement to that mitzva may serve to
illuminate the words of the Yerushalmi (Megilla 4:1):
"Moshe enacted for Israel that they should read the Torah on
Shabbatot…"
It is quite fitting that the enactment of Torah reading on
Shabbat be attributed to Moshe, if this enactment windeed meato complement the
final mitzva commanded by Moshe to Israel, when he completed the writing of the
Sefer Torah and gave it over to Israel.
(Translated by Kaeren Fish.
The unabridged Hebrew version of this shiur is archived at: http://www.vbm-torah.org/hparsha-7/hparsha7.htm.)
|