The Israel Koschitzky Virtual Beit
Midrash
The Relationship between the Two
Days of Purim
By
Rav Moshe Taragin
One of the more intriguing aspects of the mitzva of
reading the Megilla is the variety of times during which this mitzva is
performed. Generally, a mitzva is performed on the exact same date in every
location. One exception, of course, is the second day of Yom Tov, which is kept
in chutz la-aretz but not in Eretz Yisrael. However, in that instance the
communities in chutz la-aretz keep an extended mitzva; all areas observe the
same first day. Yet, in the case of Megilla, most people read on the
14th, residents of certain walled cities (mukafim) read on the 15th,
while in the days of Chazal residents of small villages read as early as the
11th. How are we to view the relationship between the 14th
of Purim and the 15th? Are they co-equal in their status as Purim? If
they are, what is the relationship between them?
A famous piece by the Ramban in the
beginning of Masekhet Megilla asserts a bold and novel approach to the history
of Purim. He claims that during the period of the miracle, most Jews had already
made aliya. Residing in
Initially, only the residents of non-walled cities
commemorated Purim, since they had sensed the danger so deeply. After some time,
Mordekhai and the Sanhedrin realized that Purim had Biblical support and should
be universally instituted, and they therefore extended the celebration to all
Jews. In recognition of the initiative taken by the non-walled residents, they
retained their original day, while residents mukaf cities – people who were
'latecomers' to the mitzva observance - were given a second day, Shushan's
original day of the 15th.
This perspective helps explain a very perplexing
statement of the gemara (2b). In attempting to derive a source for allowing
reading on the 15th, the gemara cites a verse stating that perazi
dwellers read on the 14th; if they read on the 14th, their
counterparts in walled cities must read on the 15th. The gemara then
counters: perhaps mukaf dwellers do not read at all! Why would the gemara consider the
possibility of exempting walled cities from Megilla reading? The Ramban’s approach might provide an
answer. Though the Ramban's perspective is historical in nature (he does not
quote any distinct halakhot which are impacted by his view), it clearly
establishes a hierarchy of days. The 14th is clearly the primary day
of Purim, while the 15th was originally celebrated on the first year
only by the people of Shushan, who were battling throughout the 14th.
Ultimately – after an interim of a few years - the 15th was selected
as a secondary Purim to be celebrated by those who had not originally joined in
the mitzva.
Similar sentiments lie at the heart
of an interesting halakha cited by the Yerushalmi (Megilla 2:3) about travelers
who, on Purim, are not located in either walled or open cities. Though one might
imagine that the lack of alternate urban location would force them to read based
upon the custom of their hometown, the Yerushalmi rules that they read on the
14th, which is “zeman keri'ata” – the universal day of reading. It
appears as if the Yerushalmi then quotes the dissenting opinion of Rav Mana that
travelers would read based upon the customs of their home base, assuming they
plan to return. (Astonishingly, this would imply that permanent nomads would not
read the Megilla at all!)
This Yerushalmi is actually citing an earlier statement
(1:1) that suggests an even more extreme position: if mukaf residents choose to
read on the 14th, they have fulfilled the mitzva, since this is the
primary day of reading. We
certainly do not follow this position in Yerushalmi Megilla 1:1, and we
certainly maintain that mukaf residents MUST read on the 15th.
However, these two Yerushalmis, when taken together, yield the same result as
the Ramban's historical analysis: the primary day of Purim is the
14th, with the 15th being defined as a secondary
day.
The same Yerushalmi (2:3) that
discussed the halakha for travelers raised another question which further
highlights the relationship between the days. The Yerushalmi takes it as a given
that a non-mukaf resident may not read the Megilla on behalf of mukaf residents
on the 15th; since he is not obligated on that day, he may not read
for those who are. May, however, a mukaf resident read on the 14th
for those who live in open cities, since the 14th is clearly the
primary day of Purim? Or do we say that since it is preferable for him to read
on the 15th, he is not considered obligated on the 14th
and may not read the Megilla on behalf of others? Clearly, once we assume the
earlier Yerushalmi (1:1), the issue of whether a mukaf can read for a perazi on
the 14th is rendered moot. If he may himself perform the mitzva on
the 14th, he can certainly read for others.
It is difficult to gauge this
question in the Bavli, which does not cite the various halakhot of the
14th mentioned in the Yerushalmi. The gemara (Megilla 2a) does state,
"Zemano shel zeh lo ki-zemano shel zeh" (the time of the 14th is
different from the 15th), but this is an ambiguous statement that
does not necessarily reject the premise of the Yerushalmi. Tosafot (Yevamot 14a)
cite the Yerushalmi about a perazi not reading for a mukaf on the
15th. However, they do not address the second part of the Yerushalmi,
which discusses whether a mukaf can read for a perazi on the 14th.
The Vilna Gaon (Orach Chayim 688) does indeed assert that a mukaf may read for a
perazi on the 14th.
An interesting gemara in Megilla (19a), discussing those
who change locations for Purim, presents a dispute that might touch upon our
issue. The mishna mentions that people who visit on Purim, with intent to return
home, should read as they would if at home. Rava comments that a person's
location on the 14th is what really determines the timing of his
reading. If a mukaf plans on returning home before the morning of the
14th, he should read on the 15th – just as he would at
home. If he plans on remaining past the morning of the 14th, he is
temporarily defined as a perazi and reads on the 14th. The gemara
does not discuss a situation of a perazi who travels to a walled city. Which
moment is crucial in determining his status and his reading?
Rashi and the Ramban claim that for him, the morning of
the 15th determines his status. If a perazi finds himself in a walled
city on the morning of the 15th, he must read with them. Namely, day
14 is crucial in determining a status in an open city, while day 15 is equally
important in determining status in a walled city.
The Rosh and the Ra'avad disagree, arguing that location
on the morning of the 14th is the only decisive factor. If a mukaf
remains in an open city on the 14th, he must read along with the
locals on the 14th. Similarly, if a perazi is found in a walled city
on the 14th, he is defined as temporarily mukaf and delays his
reading until the 15th. Thus, according to the Rosh, the
14th alone is responsible for dictating the schedule of keri'at
Megilla, whereas according to Rashi and the Ramban, each day is equally
significant in establishing personal identity.
This dispute reflects the aforementioned question of
whether the 14th and 15th are co-equal days, or whether
the 14th is primary and the 15th ancillary. Interestingly,
from a historical standpoint, the Ramban views the 14th as primary
and the 15th as secondary; from a halakhic standpoint, however, they
are indistinguishable - each can respectively establish temporary identity for
travelers, forcing them to conform to the local customs of keri'at
Megilla.
Purim
Sameach.